Tag Archives: Edgar Wright

The Running Man-2025

The Running Man-2025

Director Edgar Wright

Starring Glen Powell

Scott’s Review #1,557

Reviewed November 13, 2026

Grade: B

Based on Stephen King’s 1982 novel, The Running Man (2025) is the second adaptation to hit the silver screen.

The forgettable 1987 offering starring Arnold Schwarzenegger set the bar quite low for another film to be worthy of the book.

While the 1987 version is cartoonish and superfluous, the 2025 version adds some depth and low-key messages, making it feel more socially important in these troubled times.

In a near-future dystopian society, The Running Man is the top-rated television show, causing an obsession among viewers. It’s a deadly competition where contestants, known as Runners, must survive 30 days while being hunted by professional assassins.

Every move is broadcast to a bloodthirsty public, and each day fans have a chance to earn cash rewards for helping to capture the Runner.

Working-class Ben Richards (Glen Powell) is convinced by the show’s charismatic but scheming producer, Dan Killian (Josh Brolin), to enter the game as a last resort.

Ben desperately needs money to pay for health care for his ailing daughter.

But Ben is smarter than other Runners. He discovers the game’s corrupt, manipulative nature, where the public is fed false information. He becomes determined to defy the system and bring back the truth.

Director Edgar Wright keeps the action pulsating and fast-paced throughout, adding snippets of clever satire, though a good fifteen minutes or so could be trimmed.

The editing is impressive, especially during the car chase, bombing, and a terrifying airplane sequence that concludes the film. Engulfing fireballs, deadly parachute jumps, and a gun shootout aboard the flight are highlights of the action.

The main creative attraction, though, is the art direction. The first half of the film is set in Co-Op City, New York City, and finally Boston, featuring visually dark, slick modern sets.

Most of the street activity is wonderful, with sophisticated architecture looming in the background, especially powerful in the night sequences. Carefully lit windows and colorful store or restaurant sets add so much to the film’s artistry.

When they get to rural Derry, Maine, an ode to Stephen King, a lavish country mansion is a main backdrop. The massive structure features all sorts of passageways and private rooms.

The story is second-rate and implausible, naturally. The very idea of a man continually outrunning or bombing his sniper foes soon becomes silly. Ben manages to escape explosions via a drainpipe or a cavalcade of armed men seemingly at will.

Still, credit goes to Glen Powell for bringing a ton of charisma and confidence to the role and not just being a pretty-faced, marginally decent actor.

Sure, he looks great bare-chested or in a tank top that displays his tight, muscular physique, which filmmakers liberally showcase, but he also makes Ben likable and someone the audience wants to root for.

Other than Michael Cera, who plays rebel Elton Parrakis and Ben’s sidekick, the supporting cast includes big names like Brolin, Sean Hayes, William H. Macy, and Colman Domingo, who have little to do.

Brolin and Domingo have the more prominent roles but overact, making their characters purely villainous (Brolin) and played for comedy (Domingo).

And Macy’s and Hayes’s roles are so small that by the end I had nearly forgotten they were even in it.

From a political standpoint, many of the hungry, addicted viewers are patterned after MAGA individuals. Trashy, uneducated, and easily taken in, they represent moronic American citizens bamboozled by the powerful.

A wonderful example of inclusion is making Ben’s wife Black and, therefore, their daughter mixed-race.

Finally, a terrific scene occurs between Ben and an affluent woman who quickly becomes an ally, showing the disconnect between the haves and the have-nots in society.

The piss poor United States health care system is also challenged.

The film incorporates small messages throughout the action to remind viewers of the absurd power imbalance.

The Running Man (2025) is a high-octane affair with a strong progressive stance and plenty of visual treats. It’s a gripping, entertaining thrill ride with just a little more.

Land of the Dead-2005

Land of the Dead-2005

Director George A. Romero

Starring Simon Baker, John Leguizamo

Scott’s Review #1,077

Reviewed November 6, 2020

Grade: C+

Land of the Dead (2005) is a post-apocalyptic horror film written and directed by George A. Romero, the fourth of Romero’s six Living Dead movies, preceded by Night of the Living Dead (1968), Dawn of the Dead (1978), and Day of the Dead (1985).

The result is a mediocre effort, with weak acting and too much silliness. The film’s goofy nature negates any sense of foreboding or dread, despite plenty of zombies.

The result is camp over horror, rather than a blended mix of both, which would have worked better.

Comparing Land of the Dead to Night or Dawn is a tough ask, since the former is so much better and makes political points.

There is nothing like that in Land of the Dead besides a weak side story about the class distinction that goes nowhere, and some jokes about the Bush regime.

That’s a shame because it would have made the film more relevant.

What we are served is a healthy dose of shoot ’em up or slice ’em up scenes where zombie heads or some other appendage are blown or sliced off.

This was fun for a while, but I wanted something more.

Wisely, and staying true to the other films, the events are set around Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, which helps with continuity. The geographical reference to the famous “three rivers” immediately identifies the city used.

As events kick off, we learn that the zombie population has outnumbered the human population, forcing the humans to barricade themselves within a structured community for safety.

There exist the haves who live in a luxury high-rise and the have-nots who survive in squalor.

Dennis Hopper plays the rigid government figure, Paul Kaufman, and our good guy is the handsome Riley Denbo (Simon Baker), who helps those in need.

Conflict erupts when it’s discovered that the zombies exhibit superior intelligence. They storm the gates of the city in droves and wreak havoc on the people of the community.

Other characters along for the ride are Cholo (John Leguizamo), Slack (Asia Argento- yes, daughter of famous horror director Dario Argento), and Charlie (Robert Joy).

The rest of the film is a battle between good and evil (the zombies and greedy Paul) and not much else.

Why do zombies exhibit advanced intelligence? Are they cloning or are more humans becoming zombies? These questions are not answered.

Creatively, Land of the Dead looks good. It is stylistic, dark, and mysterious. Scenes where zombies parade around in misty and gloomy conditions are cool. The slicker, more commercial style gives a modern, fresh look and feel.

Reminiscent of Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later (2002), that’s not a bad thing, though it’s tepid for Romero. 28 Days Later rejuvenated the zombie genre, so patterning after it doesn’t hurt Land of the Dead.

Another positive is the homoerotic nature of the relationship between Cholo and Mike (Shawn Roberts), a rookie. Both masculine and aggressive, there exists a hint of tenderness and closeness that feels romantic.

When Mike is bitten and commits suicide to avoid turning, Cholo is devastated, implying that they might have shared a close background.

Unfortunately, this is never explored after Mike’s death.

On that note, the characters are not particularly interesting or well-crafted. Paul is merely bad, while Riley is heroic. Cholo is angry and rebellious, while Slack is a prostitute. Charlie is the sidekick.

Everyone has their place, but little substance is given to their past lives, their hopes for the future, or anything beyond escaping the zombies. I get that’s the goal, but more personal stuff would have been better.

The rest is what you would expect from a zombie film and nothing more, which feels lazy of Romero, especially since he wrote the screenplay. He tends to deliver better products with some meaning or interpretation.

In Dawn of the Dead, for example, the zombies sought the mall because it was familiar to them. One could argue that a city and its lights offer more of the same, but this feels weak and has already been explored.

I guess I was expecting more of something that would grab me into the world of the film, and nothing ever did.

A forgettable affair, Land of the Dead (2005) does not require repeated viewings as its predecessors do. This film was one-and-done for me.

Some trimmings and entertainment are present, but I yearned for more substance than a standard Saturday late-night zombie fest. There are enough of those already.