2025 Films, Brian Kirk, Emma Thompson, Judy Greer, Laurel Marsden, Marc Menchaca, Thriller

Dead of Winter-2025

January 20, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Dead of Winter-2025

Director Brian Kirk

Starring Emma Thompson, Judy Greer, Marc Menchaca

Scott’s Review #1,513

Reviewed January 20, 2026

Grade: A-

The brilliant Emma Thompson, known for Howard’s End (1992) and a bevy of other quality films, stars in and executive produces Dead of Winter (2025), a perfect movie to watch in January. If one is fortunate enough to watch on a blustery, cold, or snowy night, all the better for an ideal atmosphere.

The thriller is unpredictable and downright touching, largely thanks to Thompson, who leads the charge emotionally. To see the actor shoot, stab, and catfight her way to a beautifully shot ending is icing on the cake.

Plus, trading her sophisticated British accent in for a folksy midwestern drawl is quite pleasing.

The elements are a huge win and the main attraction of the film, other than Thompson and the eerie timeliness of the United States’ Minnesota, the setting of the film, being in the top U.S. news in late 2025/early 2026.

The stark, empty vastness of the cold land is made even more potent by the endless whiteness of the snow-covered, curving roads, the tundra of the lake, and the lake house, where most of the action takes place.

While the story can be argued to be implausible and the ending fragile, bordering on silly, requiring suspension of disbelief, Thompson’s performance more than makes up for any weak fragments.

Hit by a blizzard, a grief-stricken loner named Barb (Thompson) gets lost among backroads near a Minnesota lake and stops for help at a remote cabin in the woods where she discovers drops of blood and a startled middle-aged man (Marc Menchaca) who can’t get rid of her fast enough.

She then discovers a young woman (Laurel Marsden) kidnapped by a desperate couple intent on murder. Isolated and without cell service, Barb realizes she is the woman’s only hope of survival.

Director Brian Kirk carefully places tender flashbacks of a young Barb and her husband Kirk from smitten youngsters to tragic seniors battling Kirk’s failing health and the in-between trials and tribulations of the couple over the years.

These scenes not only create an emotional investment in the audience, but also fill in the blanks about why Barb would be possessed to go ice fishing in the middle of nowhere, all alone.

Sprinkling bits of humor that make Barb appear a kindly woman rather than an incompetent bafoon, she is a salt-of-the-earth type who opposes violence. Thompson was undoubtedly influenced by Frances McDormand’s sheriff character Marge Gunderson in 1996’s Fargo.

In fact, there are multiple Fargo comparisons to explore for fans of the Coen Brothers’ film, covering plot, atmosphere, and characters.

Judy Greer and Menchaca provide solid support as the mismatched couple with deadly intentions, whose motives become clearer as the plot unfolds. Greer’s character is pretty unlikable despite softening towards the end, but her actions are peculiar from a logistical perspective, and her acting is of high quality.

Menchaca has the more sympathetic role, and not only because the actor performs his nude scene in freezing temperatures.

The finale is set underwater, and it is a teary yet satisfying sendoff for Barb and Kirk, who make the hardest-hearted viewer believe in true love and a testament to commitment.

Likely superceding any expectations set by filmmakers, Thompson gives a bravura performance through facial expressions alone, telling much of the sentimental part of the story through her bright blue, emotion-filled eyes, pulling the audience in.

I didn’t expect to enjoy Dead of Winter (2025), a film given little notice, nearly as much as I did.

1986 Films, Catherine De Prume, Horror, Horror Anthologies, Horror-Camp, Horror-Comedy, Jeffery Delman, Matt Mitler, Melissa Leo, Nicole Picard, Scott Valentine

Deadtime Stories-1986

January 19, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Deadtime Stories-1986

Director Jeffrey Delman

Starring Scott Valentine, Nicole Picard, Cathryn de Prume

Scott’s Review #1,512

Reviewed January 19, 2026

Grade: B-

My expectations for Deadtime Stories (1986), a horror anthology with a fairy-tale focus, were loftier than the final product, which had an overall amateurish quality. I anticipated a glossier, perhaps gorier, and certainly a more compelling experience.

As far as film anthologies go, there are far better ones, like Tales from the Crypt (1972) and Vault of Horror (1973), which are much, much better. These are suggested first and foremost.

By the end credits, Deadtime Stories is largely forgettable.

Nonetheless, it’s marginally recommended for those seeking a late-night offering of an 1980s genre film type, with one of the three chapters, a take on Little Red Riding Hood, as the standout.

We are introduced to a somewhat creepy uncle who attempts to calm his restless nephew by telling him three horror stories to help him fall asleep without worrying about monsters coming to get him.

The first story involves a boy slave (Scott Valentine) used by two witches, who are attempting to resurrect their sister.

The second story is based on “Little Red Riding Hood”, where a teenage girl (Nicole Picard) mistakenly picks up a werewolf’s medicine for her grandmother.

The third story, based on “Goldilocks”, tells about three escaped mental patients who share their hideaway with a murderess (Cathryn de Prume).

The sequences between the uncle and nephew lay the foundation for what’s to come. The quality, though quite 1980s, is well-lit and dark, so the audience believes the kid is terrified of falling asleep. And who doesn’t have memories of wondering what or who is lurking in their bedroom closet?

Though bratty, the uncle shows patience and returns to the room again and again to introduce yet another story. A clever, dark, comical twist in the last shot makes this vignette satisfying.

The first story is the weakest. Said to be from medieval times, the costumes and makeup worn by the witches are the only things that impress. One witch is more grotesque than the other, with jagged, rotting teeth and a resting sneer that is more comical than scary.

Actor Scott Valentine is likable, and the romance between the young damsel in distress is nice, though there is hardly any time for it to go anywhere.

The premise of a handsome young man being sold as a slave to resurrect another witch is impressive, but the follow-through is weak, and the tale never fully satisfies.

The second story is very well thought out.

Nicole Picard as Rachel is clad in a sexy Little Red Riding Hood outfit and debates having sex with her boyfriend, who finds a dingy shed for them to make love in. Before this, she accidentally picked up a prescription for her grandmother, which was switched for one for a werewolf.

The most suspenseful and entertaining portion is when the werewolf breaks into the grandmother’s house. The acting is wonderfully bad, which makes for a delightful experience and a cat-and-mouse quality.

When a character surprisingly turns into a werewolf at the end, it is exciting and unexpected, making the chapter the best of the bunch.

Making Goldilocks a female serial killer is a terrific idea, and the macabre humor in this story is clever. The final sequence in a pizza restaurant is deliciously evil.

The rest, though, is lackluster and difficult to follow. The mental patients who escape with the help of MaMa Bauer (Melissa Leo) seem to endlessly drive around town in their dated white Chevy, crashing into objects and people.

The tale has a John Waters campy vibe, which is inspired, but the story never reaches a satisfying conclusion, other than occasional bits and pieces.

The attempt by Jeffrey Delman to make fables into horror vignettes is impressive, but unfortunately, Deadtime Stories (1986) only hits the mark now and then.

1990 Films, Frances Sternhagen, Horror, James Caan, Kathy Bates, Lauren Bacall, Richard Farnsworth, Rob Reiner, Stephen King, Thriller

Misery-1990

January 18, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Misery-1990

Director Rob Reiner

Starring Kathy Bates, James Caan

Scott’s Review #1,511

Reviewed January 18, 2026

Grade: A-

Kathy Bates and James Caan deliver exceptional performances in Misery (1990), a thriller/horror hybrid set in the snowy hills of remote Colorado over the course of a couple of winter months.

Caan plays famed novelist Paul Sheldon, who is held captive by Annie Wilkes (Bates), an obsessive and unpredictable fan. Bates won the Academy Award for Best Actress for her role.

Thanks to Rob Reiner’s superior direction, the film never lags and continuously keeps the tension boiling at a heart-racing pace. From an early sequence involving a terrible car accident to a slasher horror-worthy finale, Misery contains something for everyone.

The film is based on the enthralling 1987 Stephen King novel and a screenplay by Academy Award-winning writer William Goldman (All the President’s Men, 1976).

After completing his latest novel involving a beloved series character named Misery, Paul’s car careens off a snowy mountain road, leaving him stranded and unconscious. He is rescued by former nurse Annie, who claims to be his biggest fan.

Annie brings him to her remote cabin to recover, where her obsession takes a dark turn when she discovers that Sheldon is killing off Misery, her favorite character.

The success of Misery is due to the chemistry between Bates and Caan. While no romantic sparks exist, the taut scenes of captor and captee are enthralling as the audience nervously awaits what could happen next.

At first, thankfully rescued by Annie, Paul quickly realizes he may be better off dead. Seemingly shifting from kind to rage, Bates flawlessly reveals to the audience that something is not quite right with Annie.

As the actors play cat-and-mouse with their characters, each scene is potent as deeper levels of character texture are surfaced, especially with Annie. Why she is no longer a nurse is shocking.

They even share a tender scene dining over a lovely meal of meatloaf and red wine, though one character’s intentions are spoiled before too long.

Bits of dark humor surface mainly as Annie uses the words ‘cockadoodie’ and ‘poop’ and greedily munches on chips while watching her favorite game shows.

Keeping with the suspense, Reiner’s direction employs several jumps and starts as Annie suddenly appears out of the blue, fiendishly hovering over the injured Paul in his bed, with a look of rage or, in some cases, of unrequited love.

Comparisons to the television series Twin Peaks (1990-1991) and the films Fargo (1996) and What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962) can be recognized.

Supporting characters, the capable Sheriff Buster (Richard Farnsworth) and the horny Deputy Virginia (Frances Sternhagen), are also a married couple, and the cold, snowy small town with peculiar characters like the folksy general store clerk comes to mind when thinking of the aforementioned 1990s efforts.

The claustrophobic bedroom setting where one bedridden sane character relies on an insane character for food and medicine recalls the 1960s cult classic well. When another character uncovers the charade and tries to save the victim, the audience lets out a brief sigh of relief before the rug is pulled out from under them.

Finally, with little to do as Paul’s book agent, it’s nonetheless a treat to see legendary screen actress Lauren Bacall appear in the film.

While many of Stephen King’s adaptations are mediocre or less, it’s nice to see Misery (1990) achieve its due. Alongside Stand By Me (1986), this makes two successful King adaptations by director Reiner.

Oscar Nominations: 1 win-Kathy Bates-Best Actress (won)

2025 Films, Christoph Waltz, David Bradley, Drama, Felix Kammerer, Guillermo del Toro, Horror, Lars Mikkelsen, Mia Goth, Oscar Isaac, Science Fiction

Frankenstein-2025

January 15, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Frankenstein-2025

Director Guillermo del Toro

Starring Oscar Isaac, Jacob Elordi, Mia Goth

Scott’s Review #1,510

Reviewed January 15, 2026

Grade: A

Guillermo del Toro, known for his astounding production and art design in his films, hits a home run with a remake of Frankenstein (2025) based on Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel, unmasking a beautifully crafted film.

He pulls out all the stops to achieve an exquisite gothic look that is hard not to be mesmerized by. It reminds me of the HBO series Penny Dreadful (2014-2016) in both its subject matter and its visual style.

I worried that the sets and designs would usurp the story, but especially in the final act, the film becomes very character-driven, especially the Creature, played by Jacob Elordi. It is easy to garner sympathy for his character as the story progresses and he goes from bald and alien-like to disheveled and wild-looking.

The film is divided into three chapters: Prelude, Victor’s Tale, and The Creature’s Tale, so the pace is structured with shifting perspectives. This is a wise move.

Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) is a brilliant but egotistical scientist who brings a creature to life in a monstrous experiment that ultimately leads to the undoing of both the creator and his tragic creation.

The inclusion of Victor’s brother, William (Felix Kammerer), Elizabeth (Mia Goth), and the Blind Man (David Bradley) adds interesting and potent supporting characters who help reveal the intentions of the more prominent characters.

Mesmerizing are the sequences in the dark, evening settings, and especially within the grandiose walls of the estate where William and Elizabeth are to be married.

The cool blueish hues amongst the glowing burning candlelight provide a warm yet gruesome tone. As Elizabeth, clad in her pale white wedding dress, is carried down the bold staircase by the creature, her abdomen is caked in scarlet red blood, amid falling flower petals, another example of the powerful visuals.

In contrast, the daytime sequences usually take place amid a blustery snowstorm or in frigid, barren wastelands, with a very white color palette. Del Toro doesn’t even need to use wind sounds to portray the frigid landscape perfectly.

Lastly, the costumes are award-worthy. From the seventeenth-century wedding outfits the attendees wear to the filthy rags the Creature dons, all are well defined by societal class. The kindly Blind Man wears modest attire and lives in a barren forest area.

While both are superior in excellence and storytelling, 2025’s Frankenstein is vastly different from the 1931 version directed by James Whale and starring legendary horror actor Boris Karloff. Made nearly one hundred (gasp!) years apart, they are dissimilar in ways, and the former is more faithful to Shelley’s novel.

Elordi deserves kudos for infusing the Creature with humanity and sympathy, a character that many perceive as nothing more than a monster. His kindness and compassion mask the torture and pain he feels, wishing for death at nearly every turn.

The hulking actor is a perfect fit from a physical perspective, lumbering along the terrain and brooding with pain. His tentative relationship with Elizabeth is touching to see, and the future possibilities are endless if not for tragedy.

Isaac and Goth are also impressive. As the true film villain, Isaac’s Frankenstein is also tortured but turns to lies and deception to mask his pain. Goth, parlaying from indie horror into mainstream cinema, is one to watch as she chooses her next roles.

The lovely male relationship between the creature and the blind man is a true testament to kindness and what friendship is all about.

With his legendary visual touch, Guillermo Del Toro resurrects Frankenstein (2025) with a magnificent, nearly operatic offering that’s gloriously gothic and heartbreaking, with exceptional performances and visual mastery.

In this case, his story matches his visuals.

2023 Films, Carter Smith, Johnny Berchtold, Kyle Gallner, Liza Weil, Thriller

The Passenger-2023

January 10, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

The Passenger-2023

Director Carter Smith

Starring Johnny Berchtold, Kyle Gallner

Scott’s Review #1,509

Reviewed January 10, 2026

Grade: A-

The Passenger (2023) is a powerfully disturbing film that examines one’s purpose in life, specifically through the three main characters and a deadly chain of events set over the course of one day in a small town in Louisiana.

But if looked at more closely, lesser characters are also worth noting, making the message relatable to any viewer who feels suffocated or unmotivated.

The story is thought-provoking and intelligently written, offering a sometimes bleak perspective of existence and why we are here. The choices we make often leave scars and a life filled with regret, or, in some cases, blossom into new beginnings.

While a bit depressing as a whole, the film is rich with terrific performances and spot-on detail to small-town life. An independent-style budget is a winning formula with many exterior scenes enhancing the film’s tone.

The climactic diner scene is compelling, and the film ultimately ends on a hopeful note with a significant character having a bright future while another does not.

Randy Bradley (Johnny Berchtold) is a mysterious young man with little to say, harboring a secret from his childhood. He works at a fast-food restaurant in a dismal town, where two irritating coworkers bully him.

Randy’s boss takes a shine to him and sees a potential promotion in his future, but also doesn’t even know his first name and assumes that his last name is his first.

During a particularly dull morning shift, Randy’s coworker, Benson (Kyle Gallner), goes on a berserk and violent rampage when he sticks up for Randy. The two young men spend the rest of the day cruising the streets of their small town, pondering life and Randy’s past mistakes.

Benson is intrigued by Randy and determined to help him face his past while wrestling with his own demons and fits of aggression, which only deepen the chaos.

The Passenger could have easily been a by-the-numbers thriller and a shoot ’em up good time, but it’s more cerebral than that. The character-driven writing doesn’t always satisfy, but it raises the film way above the ranks of a genre film.

The bloody killing spree at the burger joint is exceptionally tense and the film’s best scene. As Randy is humiliated, with a seething Benson silently mopping the floor in the background, it is nail-biting to know what will happen next.

The culminating bloodsplattering will impress auteur director Quentin Tarantino and is clearly patterned after his work. It’s always satisfying when villains get their due in a bloody and gory fashion. As the dead bodies are callously dragged off to the walk-in freezer, the audience will undoubtedly give a quick smirk.

The intrigue of Randy’s backstory slowly unfolds, so the audience comes to understand the character. A terrible event that occurred in second grade involving a teacher, Miss Beard (Liza Weil), resurfaces as the teacher is introduced to the canvas in the final chapter.

How Miss Beard has fared since the event is enjoyable.

What puzzles me about The Passenger is the motivations and inner demons of Benson, though I find the character fascinating, and Gallner deserves recognition for his performance.

Suffering from rage issues, his mother appears to be bedridden at their home during a mysterious David Lynch/Twin Peaks-inspired scene when she meets Randy and asks him for the telephone.

Is Benson her caretaker? What are her issues?

Later, Benson brutally attacks a principal who was once his third-grade teacher. The beating is so savage that the man later dies. Why?

Still, the film’s minimalist nature adds oodles of realism. Despite modern times, 1970s and 1980s automobiles are seen, including Benson’s large yellow Chrysler, which has seen better days. The car is seen so often that it becomes a character.

A local greasy spoon diner where the servers have worked for years is paired with tired-looking homes and grey skies. These elements create an atmosphere that offers a rawness far superior to that of a movie set.

Director Carter Smith brings the intensity with boiling emotions and simmering secrets that examine characters residing in a small town, probably repressed. His offering, The Passenger (2023), is a pleasant surprise with flawless performances by its leads, Gallner and Berchtold.

1962 Films, Comedy, Deborah Walley, Disney, Fred MacMurray, James Neilson, Jane Wyman, Jessie Royce Landis, Kevin Corcoran, Michael Callan, Tommy Kirk

Bon Voyage!-1962

January 8, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Bon Voyage! -1962

Director James Neilsen

Starring Fred MacMurray, Jane Wyman

Scott’s Film Review #1,508

Reviewed January 8, 2026

Grade: B

James Neilson, known for directing both film and television and well-versed in the Walt Disney vibe, having worked throughout the 1960s on the television series Walt Disney’s Wonderful World of Color, provides fans of European travel with a feast of locale riches.

He offers Bon Voyage! (1962), an entertaining family adventure that multi-generations can enjoy.

Paris is the primary setting with the Eeifel Tower, the Louvre Museum, and Notre Dame prominently featured. Still, London, the French Riviera, and snippets of New York City are also featured.

Watching the film decades after 1962 is a pure delight, seeing how outfits, people, and landmarks have changed over the years.

This is the obvious highlight for me, though the dynamic between the Willards is fun in a lighthearted way, seesawing between comedy and sentimentality.

At times, the comedy is more bafoonish than laugh-out-loud, and the sequences more plot-driven than believable.

Nonetheless, the chemistry between the actors is prominent, and the story is wholesome and predictable, culminating in a feel-good experience.

After twenty years of marriage, Terre Haute, Indiana, plumber Harry Willard (Fred MacMurray) finally makes good on his promise to take his wife, Katie, played by Jane Wyman (ex-wife of United States President Ronald Reagan), on a luxurious cruise to Europe.

Hardly a honeymoon; they are accompanied by their brood: nineteen-year-old son, Elliott (Tommy Kirk), eighteen-year-old daughter, Amy (Deborah Walley), and eleven-year-old son, Skipper (Kevin Corcoran).

From the moment the group arrives at the dock by taxi cab, the bumbling Harry nearly loses the passports, and an unending series of mishaps ensues, including Amy’s romantic entanglement with handsome, wealthy Nick (Michael Callan), a sewer adventure, and a passionate Hungarian man pursuing Katie.

The film experiences highs and lows throughout.

Is Nick meant to be a disliked character? He’s actually my favorite character, except maybe for Harry, and is written quite daringly for the early 1960s, with him fervently questioning marriage and other institutions.

He ultimately disregards his wealth and decides to relocate to New York to forge a career without his family’s wealth or expectations, much to his mother, the contessa’s (Jessie Royce Landis), chagrin.

However, I could have done with more than one scene from the fabulous Landis, best known for Hitchcock’s To Catch a Thief (1955) and North by Northwest (1959), in which she also plays interesting mothers.

Though she steals her lone scene as she drips with jewels, a gorgeous dress, and struts around her lavish party, exclaiming ‘dahling’ whenever she can, we never get enough of her fabulous antics.

Still, Nick seems to be the only character with a solid set of balls who stands against societal expectations. His tense scenes with Harry about life and love are the only times the film’s writing is daring.

The rest of the writing is relatively safe and tepid.

Amy comes across as a bit wishy-washy about sex and marriage, and after prancing along the beach in a tacky outfit, she seems more of a nitwit than a serious character.

Maybe she and Nick don’t belong together after all?

Elliott, while cute in his pursuit of young women and attempts to impress them with unfounded wealth, his act grows tiresome by the film’s conclusion.

The most palpable couple is Harry and Katie, whose tender love shines through as an inspiration to other characters. The chemistry between MacMurray and Wyman is strong, showcasing them as reliable and stalwarts of true love.

Bon Voyage! (1962) is a kindhearted film, marginally recommended mainly for the locales. It’s mostly a safe affair, save for one character, and pales in comparison to more weighty films to come during the 1960s.

Oscar Nominations: Best Costume Design (Color), Best Sound

2025 Films, Biography, Craig Brewer, Drama, Ella Anderson, Erika Slezak, Fisher Stevens, Hugh Jackman, Jim Belushi, Kate Hudson, King Princess, Michael Imperioli, Mustafa Shakir

Song Sung Blue-2025

January 5, 2026 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Song Sung Blue-2025

Director Craig Brewer

Starring Hugh Jackman, Kate Hudson

Scott’s Review #1,507

Reviewed January 5, 2026

Grade: A

Knowing nothing about the film Song Sung Blue (2025) other than brief snippets of a trailer, it wasn’t on my radar to see. A sole Golden Globe Awards nomination by star Kate Hudson felt like a sentimental effort rather than merit.

Appearing to be little more than a feel-good holiday time release with a sprinkling of schmaltz and a money grab to nostalgic fans of entertainer Neil Diamond, I hesitated to go to the theater to see it.

To my immediate surprise and delight, the theater was nearly full, an anomaly in today’s quick-to-streaming world, but the importance of movie theaters is a topic for another day.

While Song Sung Blue is a delightful crowd pleaser and the songs are catchy and infectious, there is a darkness to the story, based on real-life events, that I didn’t see coming.

By combining a local singing duo’s triumph with tragedy, the film creates a perfect counterbalance that had me and the audience I was with in both tears and chuckles.

The project appears to be based on a 2008 documentary about the real-life couple.

The film stars Hugh Jackman and Hudson as Mike and Claire Sardina, who perform as the Neil Diamond tribute band Lightning & Thunder in their local area of Wisconsin, circa the 1990s.

They are struggling blue-collar folks eeking out a living as an impersonator and a part-time hairdresser, respectively. While both are middle-aged, each with an ex-spouse and a teenage daughter, and tons of bills to pay, they nonetheless adore performing in any capacity and love the thrill of life.

Mike is a recovering alcoholic, and Claire suffers from bouts of depression. Still, they meet early in the film, fall in love, and marry almost immediately.

The actors Jackman and Hudson have enormous chemistry, which makes the film work so well. The audience instantly buys their connection, love of performing, and passion for music. Why couldn’t Mike and Claire have met years ago? It’s thanks to the actors that we wish they had.

While Jackman is terrific as the Diamond performer, dazzling and charismatic in each performance, he never usurps Hudson, nor is there a perception that she is merely a backup performer.

Truth be told, I was more enamored with Hudson’s performance by a hair. Immediately drawing me in with her spot-on Midwestern accent, which never wavered, her depiction of a single middle-aged mom living in the suburbs is perfection.

Trying to be calm but occasionally exploding with rage or bursts of gleeful excitement, Hudson never overacts or makes Claire seem ridiculous. Her late-1980s crappy car, discount-rack clothes, and heart-of-gold characterization work so well.

To cement the dysfunctional yet strong family’s bond, Mike’s daughter, Angelina (King Princess), and Claire’s daughter, Rachel (Ella Anderson), instantly bond. Joined by Claire’s son, Dayna, the family structure is set.

As essential add-ons, diversity is incorporated through family friends who represent ethnic, multicultural, and LGBTQ+ communities.

These strong bonds are crucial because, before Mike and Claire can even savor the success of becoming the opening band for a Pearl Jam concert and performing with singer Eddie Vedder, tragedy strikes when a terrible accident changes their lives forever.

The first of the family tragedies hits like a ton of bricks and is so brilliantly filmed. My audience gasped in pure shock at the turn of events. A mini sigh of relief at the hint that it’s all a dream is quickly extinguished by reality, making the sequence all the more powerful.

Craig Brewer, who both directs excellently and also writes the screenplay, must love music. He delves deep into Diamond’s catalog, mentioning more obscure songs like ‘Soolaimon’ besides the obvious mainstays, ‘Sweet Caroline’ and the title track.

Thanks to pitch-perfect performances by Jackman and Hudson, Song Sung Blue (2025) is paced perfectly and hits every emotional chord. With humor, heart, and drama, it delivers a fitting tribute to one of the most beloved singer-songwriters in modern music history.

2025 Films, Art, Drama, Elle Fanning, Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, International, International Drama, Joachim Trier, Norwegian, Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård

Sentimental Value-2025

December 22, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Sentimental Value-2025

Director Joachim Trier

Starring Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård, Elle Fanning

Scott’s Review #1,506

Reviewed December 22, 2025

Grade: A

Sentimental Value (2025) is a Norwegian art film with powerful themes of love and loss, suicide, intergenerational connections, family relationships, and cinema. The intertwining of the components makes the film both dark and hopeful, thanks to beautiful, layered performances.

It is brooding, thought-provoking, and relatable in many ways, mostly showcasing quality writing and excellent acting. Not as much of Norway’s majestic countryside is shown, especially in Oslo, where the film is set, as I had hoped.

Right off the bat, the audience receives narration about a house and the generations of events, some happy and some tragic, that have occurred over the years. The house, while changed, has persevered and has become a character in the film.

One could correlate the struggles of the house with those of life; in the film, the characters are deeply flawed and troubled, suffering from alcoholism and paranoia.

After their mother dies, two sisters, Nora (Renate Reinsve) and Agnes (Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas), reunite with their estranged father, the charismatic Gustav (Stellan Skarsgård), a once-renowned director who offers stage actress Nora a role in what he hopes will be his comeback film.

The film is personal about Gustav’s frailty following his mother’s death by suicide.

When Nora turns it down, she soon discovers Gustav has given her part to an eager, yet cerebral, young Hollywood star played by Elle Fanning, who is a new fan of Gustav’s older work.

The past and deeply harbored secrets come to the surface as the characters struggle to maintain balance between their emotions and their interpretations of various life events.

An early sequence set in a theater sets the tone. Nora, a fabulous stage actor, suffers from severe stage fright, nearly rendering her unable to take the stage. The crew backstage scurries to calm her nerves and convince her to perform seconds before her cue. They’ve been through this before.

Nora is neurotic and, in fact, attempted suicide, which worries Agnes whenever there is a lapse in communication with her sister.

Other complexities, such as Gustav’s return, an unsuccessful relationship, and insecurities, affect Nora, especially when Rachel, the starlet, enters the picture.

But the winning formula is that Sentimental Value is not ‘the Nora show’. Agnes, Gustav, and Rachel are equally showcased and explored, making the film an ensemble piece.

Agnes, who starred in one of Gustav’s films as a young girl, is now married with a child and has left the industry far behind. Does she harbor regrets?

An aging Gustav has seen the cinematic world change from grand, theater-style film work to television-style streaming platforms like Netflix, taking over. Has the world left him behind?

And young Rachel is frustrated by her limited acting roles, which have made her a star but don’t showcase her true talent or love of her craft. Does she even have talent, she wonders?

As a cinemaphile, Sentimental Value left me pondering the state of cinema in a time of limited theatergoers and the popularity of watching films at home on a television, or worse, on a mobile phone.

But the success and emotion of Sentimental Value come through its characters, Nora, Agnes, Gustav, and Rachel.

The importance of the house also amazed me. As in life, things constantly evolve and change, setbacks are experienced, life and death come and go, and the cycle of life continues.

Sentimental Value (2025) is a fantastic film with main themes about life and forgiveness. It is also a stark reminder, without being preachy, about the monumental importance of mental wellness and the crippling effects mental illness can have on people.

2025 Films, Chloé Zhao, Drama, Emily Watson, Historical Drama, Jacobi Jupe, Jessie Buckley, Joe Alwyn, Noah Jupe, Paul Mescal, Sam Mendes, Steven Spielberg

Hamnet-2025

December 8, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Hamnet-2025

Director Chloé Zhao

Starring Jessie Buckley, Paul Mescal

Scott’s Review #1,505

Reviewed December 8, 2025

Grade: A

For lovers of William Shakespeare, the famous sixteenth-century playwright, poet, and actor, Hamnet (2025) is highly recommended for its recognition of his renowned tragedy, Hamlet, written in 1599 or 1600.

Any literature nut will ooze with pleasure since the tragic play is the basis for the entire film, and its creation is based on the events in the movie. This allows viewers to understand the reason for it, despite some fictionalization.

A bonus is a portion of it being performed on stage late in the movie.

And for cinemaphiles, Hamnet contains gorgeous cinematography, raw, emotionally charged acting, and a believable love story mired in heartbreak and ultimately hopefulness.

The film’s story dramatizes the marriage between Anne Hathaway (Agnes in the movie), played by Jessie Buckley, and William Shakespeare (Paul Mescal), and the impact of the tragic death of their eleven-year-old son, Hamnet, on their relationship, which inspired Shakespeare’s play Hamlet.

Sam Mendes and Steven Spielberg produced the film, which ensured it was made, and Chloé Zhao directed it. The financial help undoubtedly made sure (hopefully) that Zhao could make the film she wanted, and the final product looks like her vision.

Zhao is well known for directing Nomadland (2021), a movie with powerful landscapes, and Hamnet is no different in its exterior riches, though it is set in the late 1500s rather than the present.

She includes peaceful green forests, lush with quiet, thoughtful sequences, leading the viewer to enjoy the tranquility and mystique rather than to incorporate a storyline purpose.

It’s an overall vibe.

As characters wander along a path or a garden, the audio enhancement of birds chirping pairs well with greenery or flowers lit with golden sunshine.

A colder, grey vibe enshrouds the interior scenes of humble cottages, where characters peel boiled eggs, perform tedious household tasks, or share a modest meal.

I totally bought the authenticity of the 16th and 17th-century locales, costumes, sets, and characters. This buy-in did wonders to reflect the believability of everything else.

The leading actors get an A+ for chemistry and connection, with powerfully acted, sometimes guttural scenes, scene after scene.

From the first garden scene, when Buckley and Mescal, strangers, meet amid instant attraction and infatuation, the scene smolders with fiery romance. How the actors conjured that amount of intensity is remarkable.

They are forever linked when they give in to their attraction, shortly after which results in a pregnancy, much to the chagrin of his family.

Separately, Agnes is intriguing and spiritual, rumored to be the daughter of a forest witch. Before her death, Agnes’ mother taught her herbal lore, which Agnes later uses to heal a cut on William’s forehead.

William is thoughtful, bookish, and very introspective. His intensity towards his writing and art is inspiring.

The characters get each other; Agnes even insists he go to London, where he can work in a proper environment and understand his creative mindset.

Buckley especially delivers the goods with ferocious acting and startling realism.

Equally noteworthy are Jacobi and Noah Jupe, who play the real Hamlet and the stage Hamlet. Brothers in real life, both look similar and possess top-notch acting skills.

And can Emily Watson (playing Mary Shakespeare) not be great in anything?

A minor gripe is why Buckley is positioned as the lead actress while Mescal is deemed the supporting actor. As equals, it’s not her story versus his; together, they share the depth of the storyline as a pair. And Shakespeare as a supporting character doesn’t sound right.

Destined to be rewarded for its artistic merit, humanistic integrity, and truthful approach, Hamnet (2025) is a beautifully slow-building film. It elicits heartwarming cinematic perfection.

2025 Films, Andrew Garfield, Ayo Edebiri, Chloë Sevigny, Julia Roberts, Luca Guadagnino, Michael Stuhlbarg, Thriller

After the Hunt-2025

November 29, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

After the Hunt-2025

Director Luca Guadagnino

Starring Julia Roberts, Ayo Edebiri, Andrew Garfield

Scott’s Review #1,504

Reviewed November 29, 2025

Grade: B+

After the Hunt (2025) is a thriller mired in questions and secrets, which, from the outset, director Luca Guadagnino successfully creates. An atmosphere of the Yale University elitist intelligentsia, enshrouded in internal chaos, just reeking to be let go.

Julia Roberts reemerges into the awards conversation with a startlingly raw and introspective performance as Alma, a professor harboring a secret past that is invaded by present circumstances.

Guadagnino, known for the brilliant LGBTQ+-themed Call Me by Your Name (2017), usually incorporates emotional complexity, eroticism, and lavish visuals into his work. This one is highly character-driven, embellishing the thoughts and desires of the leads.

For the viewer, After the Hunt remains compelling because we don’t know whom to believe, with allegiances teetering from character to character, including Alma herself.

Alma drinks too much, pops pills, and has a secret apartment away from her eccentric husband, Frederick, wonderfully played by Michael Stuhlbarg. Despite being a psychiatrist, he coddles Alma and serves as her househusband rather than an equal, causing him peculiar bouts of weird behavior.

Meanwhile, Alma is desperately seeking tenure at Yale.

At a boozy party at Alma’s house one night, amid societal and philosophical conversations, Maggie (Ayo Edebiri), one of her students, uncovers a secret about Alma while snooping in her bathroom.

Later, Maggie, who is black and gay, leaves the party with Hank, one of Alma’s handsome colleagues (Andrew Garfield).

The next morning, Alma finds herself at a personal and professional crossroads when Maggie, a star student, levels an accusation against Hank, claiming she was sexually assaulted.

As the onion is peeled back, it is discovered that Maggie plagiarized a paper and has wealthy parents who help the University maintain its financial status. She is also obsessed with Alma, even wearing the same shade of fingernail polish.

At the same time, Hank is a volatile hothead with a vicious temper. Does he have a romantic past with Alma?

Who should Alma believe, and what should the audience think? Are we supposed to side with Maggie because it’s politically correct to believe a young black female over a white male?

Maggie immediately put me off. Was that the intention? I wanted to like her, but just didn’t. This was even before it was known that she was privileged.

By contrast, I immediately did like Hank. His passion for philosophy and his yearning for debate about the younger generation being coddled resonated with me.

Guadagnino offers more than solely a compelling story in After the Hunt.

As a Connecticut resident, the exterior locales are powerful. Rich camera shots of the massive Yale campus, especially on snowy days, provide wonderful texture to the film. A small, cruddy yet cozy Indian diner, strangely empty, serves as a meeting point for two poignant scenes.

Besides the campus, New Haven, Connecticut, is not the ritzy Greenwich, Connecticut, by any means, and Guadagnino must have realized this by incorporating ugly waterside views and glimpses of factories.

A quiet, introspective director, many scenes of Alma staring into the distance, in thought or pondering life, play well with philosophical debate scenes between faculty and students.

While the film’s pacing is slow, it works for me. And throughout the question remains of what Alma’s secret is and whether Hank sexually assaulted Maggie, or is it all lies?

The film is also reminiscent of Fatal Attraction (1987) or Single White Female (1992). The key to the film may lie in Maggie’s obsession with Alma, which slowly unfolds.

In what may be Julia Roberts’ best film role to date, After the Hunt (2025) doesn’t hit a home run with a slightly ambiguous, unsatisfying ending, but with stellar performances from Roberts, Edebiri, Garfield, and Stuhlbarg, it’s enough to warrant a watch.

1976 Films, Brian De Palma, Cliff Robertson, Geneviève Bujold, John Lithgow, Thriller

Obsession-1976

November 25, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Obsession-1976

Director Brian De Palma

Starring Cliff Robertson, Geneviève Bujold, John Lithgow

Scott’s Review #1,503

Reviewed November 25, 2025

Grade: B+

Brian De Palma’s Obsession was made in 1976, the same year as his iconic horror film Carrie, which made him a household name. This kicked off a period of other great De Palma films, like Dressed to Kill (1980) and Blow Out (1981).

The marginally successful film gained respectability because the director acknowledged that Alfred Hitchcock’s 1958 masterpiece Vertigo heavily influenced Obsession, which undoubtedly drew many to sit up and take notice.

Since Vertigo is a film I am ‘obsessed’ with, I can easily see the blueprint that it is on many levels.

Film composer and Hitchcock stalwart Bernard Herrmann beautifully scores both movies, so the similarities are undeniable on both a musical and a plot level. I immediately recognized the orchestral and mysterious notes that fill Vertigo with intrigue and sophistication.

A case of doppelgangers and an obsession with a presumed-dead character or the ghost of someone from the past are common elements in both, as a tangled web is spun.

The heroic male character struggles with this obsession while spiraling out of control and making rash or poor decisions.

The story begins in 1959 and centers on a prominent New Orleans businessman, Michael Courtland (Cliff Robertson), who is riddled with guilt following the death of his wife, Elizabeth (Geneviève Bujold), and daughter during a kidnapping-rescue attempt gone wrong.

Fast forward to 1975, and Brian, while traveling to Florence, Italy, meets and falls in love with a young woman who is the exact look-alike of his long-dead wife. He must do anything to have her and imagines she actually is his wife.

While Obsession is a compelling film with an appropriate, suspenseful buildup and a startling twist during the final act, Vertigo’s influence also makes it a weakness for Obsession on its own merits.

Since I knew it was patterned after such greatness, I also found myself constantly comparing it. While Obsession is good, it’s also more of an opening act to Vertigo’s headliner status.

Some standard De Palma particulars are incorporated, which is what I waited for throughout, and some are not.

The slow-motion sequence appears at the conclusion of the film, in a long shot of an airport terminal, as one character runs to another. The fact that one character weilds a hidden gun makes the perilous situation even more daring.

The dreamlike quality is apparent, including a puzzling romance scene in which Michael imagines a marriage and a steamy bedroom sequence with Elizabeth. He also imagines the kidnapping events happening again.

Is this real or imagined?

The split screen, so potent in Sisters and Dressed to Kill, is abandoned altogether.

De Palma also treads lightly on the subject matter of incest that could have made Obsession daring and cutting edge, but instead is softened considerably. This irritated me slightly, since I assumed there would be pushback from studio executives.

Robertson and Bujold have adequate chemistry, and it’s a treat to see John Lithgow in what would be the first of several De Palma films.

Obsession (1976) is worth a watch for De Palma fans because, like Sisters (1973), it offers a glimpse of the greatness he was about to achieve with grander, more fleshed-out efforts.

Some early tools from the director’s arsenal are featured, making the watch enjoyable and a treat for anyone with a fondness for what air travel was like in the mid-1970s, well before terrorism and 9/11 changed the world forever.

1993 Films, Angela Bassett, Biography, Brian Gibson, Jenifer Lewis, Khandi Alexander, Laurence Fishburne, Phyllis Yvonne Stickney, Shavar Ross, Vanessa Bell Calloway

What’s Love Got to Do with It-1993

November 22, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

What’s Love Got to Do with It-1993

Director Brian Gibson

Starring Angela Bassett, Laurence Fishburne

Scott’s Review #1,502

Reviewed November 22, 2025

Grade: A-

Many biographies have been made in cinema over the years, but What’s Love Got to Do with It? (1993) is the only one, to my knowledge, about the legendary and leggy singer Tina Turner.

The blues and rock diva, known for her lioness wigs and powerful voice, had a rough road to achieving her greatest success in her 40s.

Made over thirty years ago, more modern biographies have both succeeded (Bohemian Rhapsody-2018 and Rocketman-2019 come to mind) and failed (Respect-2021), but impressively, What’s Love Got to Do with It? holds up well and provides emotional power throughout.

Angela Bassett and Laurence Fishburne are exceptionally well cast. As Tina and her abusive husband, Ike, the actors give a lot of investment and believability into the performer’s tumultuous relationship.

The film, based on Turner’s 1986 autobiography I, Tina, is not quite a solid A because Bassett, while terrific as Turner, lip-syncs to Turner’s vocals. It’s left unclear why Ike is such a controlling tyrant and why she stayed with him for close to 20 years, and some aspects are embellished from the autobiography.

But the acting and other aspects usurp these nitpicky particulars.

The production numbers when Turner performs are electric, and the film’s best parts. Especially ‘River Deep-Mountain High’ and the title track allow Bassett to embellish the superstar in raw fury and guttural range.

It is clear how the actor channels Tina through gestures, stage confidence, and passion for her art. It’s beautiful to observe and be inspired by.

The story is based on the life of the legendary soul singer, who was born Anna Mae Bullock to an absentee mother and father and a meager upbringing in the rural South. When her grandmother, who raised her, dies, she reconnects with her birth mother and sister (Jenifer Lewis and Phyllis Yvonne Stickney) in 1960s St. Louis, where she meets the charismatic Ike, already an established star.

As a musical team, Ike and Tina take the charts by storm. But as his physical abuse worsens, Tina has to make the tough decision to leave Ike and set out on her own.

This eventually leads to her climactic return to the pop charts in 1984, achieving massive success.

The abuse scenes are startling and challenging to watch. At first, Ike appears smitten with Tina (whom he renamed), but he beds her while married to another woman. The luster quickly wears off as he becomes militant about her performances and berates her when she dares to question his authority.

A brutal rape scene in a music studio left me shocked and sickened.

Again, I wondered what made Ike the way he was, and it’s a minor misfire by director Brian Gibson and screenwriter Kate Lanier. I asked if his own father beat him and subsequently taught him that fame and success are the be-all and end-all, but it gnawed at me that I had no proof.

A brief flashback of Ike’s father being stabbed in front of him told me little.

Also mysterious is why it takes Tina so long to finally leave him, even though she is willing to be penniless as long as she can keep her stage name. Her kind friend, Darlene (Khandi Alexander), urges her to leave him for years.

Delightful is watching Bassett and Fishburne play off each other, proving that amazing chemistry is so important in film. I never bought that Ike really loved Tina; instead, saw her as a talent to solidify his career.

The finale, a live performance by the real Tina, propels Bassett’s already divine performance. The audience can confirm that her portrayal is spot on by identifying similarities.

With a miscast, the differences would have been glaring.

Thanks to superb acting, impressive production design that encapsulates the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, and a hefty dose of the star’s greatest hits, What’s Love Got to Do with It (1993) is one of the better biopics.

Oscar Nominations: Best Actor-Laurence Fishburne, Best Actress-Angela Bassett

"Weird Al" Yankovic, 2025 Films, Akiva Schaffer, Busta Rhymes, CCH Pounder, Comedy, Danny Huston, Dave Bautista, Kevin Durand, Liam Neeson, Pamela Anderson, Paul Walter Hauser, Priscilla Presley

The Naked Gun-2025

November 20, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

The Naked Gun-2025

Director Akiva Schaffer

Starring Liam Neeson, Pamela Anderson

Scott’s Review #1,501

Reviewed November 20, 2025

Grade: B-

With different levels of cinema for audiences to choose from, The Naked Gun (2025), a reboot of a long-dormant franchise, is meant for a particular spoof comedy fan who expects goofiness over a heavy subject matter.

It’s not The Godfather (1972), 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), or Vertigo (1958), and pondering a more profound meaning or luxuriating in great visual art will not happen.

Instead, for some tepid chuckles and escapist fare from a rough day at work or a family matter one is hoping to run away from, director Akiva Schaffer crafts a smirky one-liner riddled experience in lunacy.

The fourth in The Naked Gun franchise, and the first in over 30 years, the plot follows the son (Liam Neeson) of Lt. Frank Drebin, also named Frank Drebin, as he steps into his father’s footsteps to prevent the closure of Police Squad.

Fans know that Leslie Nielsen played bumbling Frank senior in the first three installments, while George Kennedy played his sidekick, Captain Ed Hocken. Priscilla Presley played love interest Jane Spencer.

Essentially, Nielsen is replaced by Neeson, Kennedy by Paul Walter Heiser, and Jane by Pamela Anderson.

Preseley does quickly appear in a cameo (if you could even call it that), sitting on a sofa watching television.

While it is familiar territory to someone like me, who has seen only one other in the series and barely remembers it, the pattern is very one-note and more of a retro greatest hits compilation than anything new and noteworthy.

If we’re talking the 1980s, think Police Academy for a similar reference, and there is little reason I see to dust the franchise off the shelf.

We meet the new Lieutenant Frank Drebin Jr. of the LAPD Police Squad, who single-handedly dispatches a gang of bank robbers while disguised as a schoolgirl.

The fact that he morphs from a 3-foot-tall girl into a 6-foot-tall grown man is expected to be plausible.

Unbeknownst to Drebin, the bank heist is a distraction to steal a gadget called the “P.L.O.T. (“Primordial Law Of Toughness”) Device” from a safe deposit box by the film’s villain Richard Cane (Danny Huston), who is intent on reverting the human race to primal animals who kill each other.

This is to make sure that the world’s billionaires are safe to rule the planet.

The audience is not expected to wonder who will be left to serve the billionaires, or otherwise do the world’s grunt work.

The fewer plot points asked, the better.

Predictably, hard-edged Police Chief Davis (CCH Pounder) reassigns Frank when his over-the-top law enforcement becomes a legal liability.

From there, we watch Drebin eat bad food, have diarrhea, and suffer further embarrassments while working alongside Beth Davenport (Anderson), a crime novelist, to figure out why her brother died in a car accident deemed a suicide.

It’s hard to believe Neeson is the same actor who received an Oscar nomination for playing Oskar Schindler in the 1993 masterpiece Schindler’s List.

Still, shifting to an action star in 2008 proves that some actors accept projects to stay relevant.

While the plot is inane and easy to dissect with over-the-top plot points, overacting, and silly potty jokes, it can almost be overlooked for simple moments that bring a sliver of joy.

The chemistry between Neeson and Anderson is not bad, mainly because the actors know how to create it. As they banter and deliver monotone dialogue, the woodenness actually becomes an asset.

The scenes that made me smile were solely between the duo as they embraced the lines served to them to the best of their ability. Creating enough comic wit to remain entertaining, I clamored for more between the two and less of the ridiculousness of everything else.

Neeson and Anderson are the saving grace in an otherwise shit show.

The Naked Gun (2025) knows what kind of film it is, which helps level-set expectations. There is something refreshingly silly about anticipating a bad movie and having fun with it nonetheless.

1980 Films, Best Picture Oscar Winners, Dinah Manoff, Donald Sutherland, Drama, Elizabeth McGovern, Judd Hirsch, M. Emmet Walsh, Mary Tyler Moore, Robert Redford, Timothy Hutton

Ordinary People-1980

November 15, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Ordinary People-1980

Director Robert Redford

Starring Mary Tyler Moore, Donald Sutherland, Timothy Hutton

Scott’s Review #1,500

Reviewed November 15, 2025

Grade: A

Ordinary People (1980) demonstrates that a quiet film with excellent writing and superb acting can pack an emotional punch, surpassing the gimmicks or action sequences that other films often employ to draw attention.

It’s character-driven and tells a story of a family tragedy and the ramifications and complications that affect the surviving members. The emotional intelligence that director Robert Redford embeds in the film is astonishing.

Deservedly winning the 1980 Best Picture Academy Award, it proves how crucial good writing and good characters are to a quality film.

Significantly, it propelled 1970s television sitcom star Mary Tyler Moore, known until then as the iconic girl-next-door type, into cinematic respectability. Her narcissistic, uptight character was uncharted territory and a career risk for the actor who ended up exceeding expectations.

Tortured by guilt following the death of his older brother, Buck, in a sailing accident, we meet the alienated teenager Conrad Jarrett (Timothy Hutton) right off the bat, following a failed suicide attempt.

Returning home to his affluent Chicago suburban life following an extended stay in a psychiatric hospital, Conrad tries to deal with his mental anguish and also reconnect with his mother, Beth (Mary Tyler Moore), who has grown bitter after the accident.

His emotionally wounded father, Calvin (Donald Sutherland), tries to gently repair the family damage with the help of a psychiatrist, Dr. Berger (Judd Hirsch), who begins to treat Conrad.

The screenplay, written by Alvin Sargent, is based on the 1976 novel by Judith Guest.

Combined with Redford’s masterful direction, the story never shifts to a soap opera direction with Calvin or Beth having affairs, turning to booze, or other showy plot devices, intent on stirring up drama.

Instead, it’s about how they and Conrad handle their trauma. Each has an individual view of the events, who they blame, and how they cope with such trauma.

The audience can easily empathize and relate to the incidents if anyone has faced a death, loss of a job, an accident, a divorce, or any such upheaval in their lives.

The posh autumnal suburban landscape is enveloped by Redford, which enhances the experience. The Jarretts’ affluence is put to good use as they attend local theater, play golf, take European vacations, and can afford to send Conrad to a psychiatrist.

Exterior shots of large suburban homes, accompanied by luxury cars, housekeepers, well-manicured lawns, and sleek golf courses, all convey the comforts of life.

It makes their pain a bit more understandable as they, especially Beth, soak in luxury as a way of comforting herself from the loss of her son.

Can’t their money help alleviate some of the suffering?

I had mixed emotions about Beth’s character. Appearing to be a cold bitch with Conrad and the assumption that she favored the dead son, she never visits Conrad in the hospital after his suicide attempt, instead fleeing to Europe on vacation. She engages in small talk with him rather than caring for him.

What kind of mother could do that?

But I realize that she is hurting too, and when she becomes teary-eyed or crumbles in her husband’s arms, I feel genuine sympathy for her, a testament to Tyler Moore’s talents.

My favorite character, though, is Conrad (Hutton).

Via flashbacks, we see the closeness of the brothers’ relationship and the action that occurred during the drowning.

Hutton delivers on many levels. Whether staring into the distance, pondering events, exploding with rage, tenderly sharing a date with a blossoming love interest, Jeannine (Elizabeth McGovern), or struggling with a friend, Karen, his performance is always inspiring.

Ordinary People (1980) marks his directorial debut; Redford crafts a family drama rich in layers and a beautifully moving pace that draws the viewer into the lives of the primary characters.

The still taboo of mental illness and therapy is also embraced, showing that expressing feelings is better than repressing emotions.

Oscar Nominations: 4 wins-Best Picture (won), Best Director-Robert Redford (won), Best Actress-Mary Tyler Moore, Best Supporting Actor-Timothy Hutton (won), Judd Hirsch, Best Adapted Screenplay (won)

2025 Films, Aidan Delbis, Alicia Silverstone, Comedy, Dark Comedy, Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Stavros Halkias, Thriller, Yorgos Lanthimos

Bugonia-2025

November 8, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Bugonia-2025

Director Yorgos Lanthimos

Starring Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons

Scott’s Review #1,499

Reviewed November 8, 2025

Grade: A

Going into the movie theater to see Bugonia (2025), I had the apt knowledge that off-center iconoclast Yorgos Lanthimos directed the film once again using his muse, superstar Emma Stone, in his latest project.

Responsible for the weird efforts like The Favourite (2018), Poor Things (2023), and a bizarre early effort, Dogtooth (2009), I knew I was in store for something off-kilter if not altogether unhinged.

My mouth salivated for something deranged, and I was not disappointed.

I hoped that nobody in the theater was expecting something similar to La La Land (2016), also starring Stone. No disrespect intended, since I adore that film, but a story about a chirpy aspiring actress conquering Hollywood is hardly a Lanthimos storyline.

The creative Greek director hits a home run with Bugonia while subsequently convincing Stone to shave her head and take on a bald role.

Like several other recently released films, Lanthimos critiques modern society and the decisions made by this generation of human beings. He challenges the audience to ask if people have simply fucked up the Earth.

Should we start over from the dinosaur era and try to get things right?

By the time the credits rolled and a few nervous chuckles had enveloped the audience, I knew that not everyone had grasped this Lanthimos film.

Sigh.

Without spoiling the film, a late-inning surprise catapulted Bugonia from very good to exceptional, leaving me pondering the conclusion and its ramifications for days.

The idea is based on the 2003 South Korean film ‘Save the Green Planet!’ by Jang Joon-hwan. Bugonia follows two young men, led by a spectacular performance by Jesse Plemons, who kidnap a powerful CEO (Stone), suspecting that she is secretly an alien intent on destroying Earth.

Ludicrous as it sounds, the plot begins to unravel as Plemons and Stone play kidnapper and kidnappee against the backdrop of a dilapidated suburban house, each trying to outsmart the other using reasoning and conspiracy theories to argue their case.

It becomes a game of chess.

Stone’s Michelle Fuller, the CEO of a major pharmaceutical company, who has a secret connection to Plemons’s Teddy Gatz, now a beekeeper, initially assumes Teddy is dimwitted and an easy target to outmaneuver.

Along with Teddy’s cousin, Don (Aidan Delbis), an intellectually disabled young man, they accost and keep Michelle bound and tied in their basement, encouraging her to confess to being an alien and taking them back to her planet at the upcoming lunar eclipse.

The audience goes along for the ride, wondering if the characters are who they seem to be and exactly how the wacky plot will play out.

Will Michelle ultimately escape? Will the more sympathetic Don come to Michelle’s rescue?

The plot thickens when flashbacks reveal a connection between Teddy’s mother, Sandy (Alicia Silverstone), and Michelle.

Is Teddy seeking revenge, or does he believe Michelle is an alien? Or both?

Stone can’t do enough with her large green eyes, only enhanced by her bald head, which Teddy and Don shave. Her shock at both being shaved bald and accused of being an alien elicits comical moments from the actor.

Her timing is perfect as she emits corporate jargon meant to placate and manipulate Teddy. She assumes she can talk her way out of her crisis by putting on her CEO hat, which is intended to intimidate him.

The fun part is that we don’t know whether to root for Michelle or root for Teddy.

Stone and Plemons play off each other so well, keeping the dialogue juicy and crisp, and entirely engaging the audience.

Bugonia (2025) offers up twisted twists and turns set against delicious cinematography and a couple of blood-spurting dark comedy moments.

A cringy torture scene and a suggested childhood molestation only add to the bizarre puzzle that Lanthimos creates.

Fans of the director will celebrate and champion the film for its uniqueness and dizzying thrill rides. Hopefully, he will continue to inspire young filmmakers to create unconventional and thought-provoking offerings.

2025 Films, Hailee Steinfeld, Horror, Jack O'Connell, Li Jun Li, Michael B. Jordan, Miles Caton, Omar Benson Miller, Ryan Coogler, Wunmi Mosaku

Sinners-2025

October 31, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Sinners-2025

Director Ryan Coogler

Starring Michael B. Jordan, Hailee Steinfeld, Miles Caton

Scott’s Review #1,498

Reviewed October 31, 2025

Grade: B+

After hearing so much positivity about Sinners (2025), director Ryan Coogler’s latest film, which shifts from independent (Fruitvale Station, 2013) and Marvel (Black Panther, 2018) films to the horror genre, I excitedly waited months to see it.

Coogler shifts into a vein more like Jordan Peele, a contemporary director known for daring horror message offerings like Get Out (2017) and Us (2019).

While very good, it’s not the A+ daring, horrific, extravaganza I was expecting. The tone is dark, mysterious, and compelling, but it takes an awfully long time to actually get going despite a looming expectation of bloody events to come.

Or maybe that’s because my expectations told me to await thrills and gore mixed with a powerful storyline.

Nonetheless, had I not listened to the buzz, I might have been more satisfied. Instead, I was impressed but not blown away.

Sinners reminded me very much of the HBO series True Blood (2008-2014), with its southern vampire fantasy/horror mix, but featuring an almost entirely black cast and a lot of music.

Set in 1932 in the Mississippi Delta, the film stars Michael B. Jordan in dual roles as twin brothers, ‘Smoke’ and ‘Stack’ Moore, one of whom is a criminal, who return to their hometown, where they confront a supernatural evil.

The brothers return from Chicago, where they have made an illegal fortune, and purchase a sawmill from a racist landowner to start a juke joint for the local Black community.

They reconnect with local friends and musicians, offering substantial amounts of money to help make opening night a grand experience.

Coogler wisely begins the film, which takes place over the course of a twenty-four-hour period, the morning after the thrilling Saturday night events, so we somewhat know something bad will happen.

Sammie Moore (Miles Caton), the brother’s cousin, staggers into his preacher father’s church during services, clutching his coveted guitar. He is an aspiring blues musician and is wounded.

Michael B. Jordan, clearly the star of the film and frequently in Coogler films, is an Oscar hopeful by portraying dual roles. With a good versus evil vibe, he may make the cut, given the differing personalities fleshed out in the parts.

While offering decent cinematography and a southern flavor that adds dimensions, it takes so long for much action to arrive that the payoff isn’t as satisfying as I’d like.

Sure, the last forty-five minutes work well as the dusk-to-dawn fight scenes, a workable whodunit of who’s a vampire and who isn’t a vampire, and hold your breath moments of which characters will unwittingly invite a vampire inside.

The last sequence is excellent when 1932 suddenly turns into the 1990s, and one character is still left alive. The film ends happily as the character realizes a pact made in the ghastly night years ago has allowed him to live.

A question repeatedly dangled before the audience’s noses like a carrot before a horse is whether we would give in to temptation and live forever as a vampire.

Wouldn’t it be wonderful never to age? I’ll admit to realizing the appeal.

The supporting characters, including Stack’s girlfriend, Mary (Hailee Steinfeld), the bouncer, Cornbread (Omar Benson Miller), and Smoke’s estranged wife, Annie (Wunmi Mosaku), deliver strong performances.

However, the southern accents occasionally feel overdone, but the lovely costumes never do.

Neither good nor bad, the characters don’t look genuine from the 1930s, and there is more inclusion (a Korean family in the deep south?) than in real life.

Still, the film works as a fantasy, right?

Coogler gets points for creativity and showcasing racism of the 1930s still exists today, but treads lightly on going full throttle with any message.

Instead, he shows that strong black characters can forge their own success in a racist world, accompanied by a toe-tapping melody and bluesy guitars.

Sinners (2025) crosses genres like horror, supernatural, fantasy, and musical, with some sexy scenes of blood and sex amid music. The creativity is there, but it’s a slow build.

2025 Films, Action, Alana Haim, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, Crime Thriller, Favorite Film of the Year, Kevin Tighe, Leonardo DiCaprio, Paul Thomas Anderson, Regina Hall, Sean Penn, Teyana Taylor, Thriller, Tony Goldwyn

One Battle After Another-2025

October 20, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

One Battle After Another-2025

Director Paul Thomas Anderson

Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Chase Infiniti

Scott’s Review #1,497

Reviewed October 20, 2025

Grade: A

In my opinion, one of the modern great directors, Paul Thomas Anderson has released One Battle After Another (2025), a film rich with thrills and relevance. Sought to be made for years, the film is inspired by the 1990 novel Vineland by Thomas Pynchon with some narratives by Anderson peppered in.

Undoubtedly, Anderson was influenced by the current state of the United States in terms of immigration issues and tyrancy in the ICE (United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement) organization.

While immigration is not a new hot button issue, the inhumanity heaved onto ‘illegal immigrants’ and some US citizens is current as well as powerful.

Additionally, a frightening tone of racism and ‘white power’ is an underlying theme of the film contrasting covert hatred by a group of white supremisists with the humanity of revolutionaries who attack the political system.

Therefore, the film has an overwhelming modern feel.

Otherwise, the breakneck twists and turns and action make One Battle After Another the crown jewel in storytelling fun and an Anderson offering that could easily be added to his top 5 of all time.

Events follow an ex-revolutionary explosive device expert, “Ghetto” Pat Calhoun / “Rocketman” / Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio) who is forced back into his former combative lifestyle when a corrupt military officer pursues him and his daughter.

With new identies, they had assumed they could live a peaceful life of tranquility but they were in for a rude awakening.

Set in present times, the film begins fifteen years before events later in the story but with a clear linkage. This ensures the audience is invested in the characters especially in the latter half as we get to know them better.

While DiCaprio can never deliver a bad performance and firmly grips the lead role as the intelligent yet comically clumbsy Bob, other actors shine making One Battle After Another an ensemble piece dripping with award worthy performances and hefty accolades.

DiCaprio improvises his way through the script with stutters and stammering enveloping his character with endearing qualities like forgetting a vital password or falling off a roof. Nonetheless, he possesses sentimenal and introspective moments towards his life and teenaged daughter, Willa Ferguson / Charlene Calhoun, played by Chase Infiniti.

Infiniti is tremendous in what is her breakout role playing a mixed race girl attempting to lead an everyday life while having to pay for the crimes and mistakes of her parents.

Playing confident, yet scared and vulnerable, Infiniti is quite the find. Is she destined to follow in her parents footsteps?

Teyana Taylor is brutally talented as she plays Perfidia Beverly Hills, a tough as nails, take no prisoner, kick ass young woman known to tease and humiliate her prey strictly for laughs.

Regina Hall and Benicio del Toro leverage their kind hearted and supportive characters with emotional flare and some needed humor especially on the part of del Toro.

The standout, however is Sean Penn. Giving a bravura performance as the hated and racist Colonel Steven J. Lockjaw, a military officer who pursues the French 75, he sneers and pouts, never playing the character over the top or for laughs.

He truly believes he comes from a superior race while bedding the women he despises.

A three-way highway car chase scene nearly rivals classic sequences in The French Connection (1971) and The Getaway (1972). As three separate drivers points of views are featured along a hilly highway with deadly results the audience is treated to rear view mirror and reaction shots.

I honestly did not know what would happen next and was delighted at the outcome.

Hopefully, as the years go by One Battle After Another (2025) will be remembered for embracing different genres and delivering a powerhouse final product. With great acting, editing, storytelling, and action the film has got it all.

Add in a timely message and you’ve got yourself a gem.

2025 Films, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Alfie Williams, Cillian Murphy, Danny Boyle, Edvin Ryding, Horror, Jack O'Connell, Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes

28 Years Later-2025

October 13, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

28 Years Later-2025

Director Danny Boyle

Starring Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Alfie Williams

Scott’s Review #1,496

Reviewed October 13, 2025

Grade: B

For loyal fans of the 28 Days Later film franchise, launched in 2002, 28 Years Later (2025) may be a disappointment.

Not what I expected, the film has less raw horror than its two predecessors, but it adds a deeper emotional connection, linking various characters together.

A family is introduced, which helps provide character depth. Apparently, 28 Years Later is the first of a new trilogy, which may leave the first two installments by the wayside.

Still, the film is uneven and meanders quite a bit until the final thirty minutes or so, when I felt more invested in the events.

This is surprising, given the participation of Academy Award-winning participants, including director Danny Boyle, writer Alex Garland, and actor Cillian Murphy, as Executive Producer. It also features the original cinematographer (Anthony Dod Mantle), so I’m surprised how little connection it has to the original.

A weak sub-plot featuring Sir Jimmy Crystal, the leader of the Jimmy Savile–inspired “Jimmy” cult, and a survivor of the original outbreak is the only connection.

It’s been almost three decades since the rage virus escaped a biological weapons laboratory, and now, still in a heavily enforced quarantine, some have found ways to exist amidst the infected.

One group of survivors lives on a small island connected to the mainland by a single, heavily defended causeway.

When Spike (Alfie Williams), the twelve-year-old son of Jamie and Isla (Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Jodie Comer), leaves the island on a mission to find help for his ailing mum, he discovers secrets, wonders, and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but also other survivors.

He encounters characters like “Samson”, a physically imposing Alpha leader of the infected, the odd Dr Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), a former doctor and survivor of the outbreak, and a pregnant infected woman.

Isla, who teeters in and out of sanity, is along for the ride.

Comer, known for the television series Killing Eve (2018-2022), has begun to forge her way into feature films and is the standout performer.

Isla suffers from a mentally debilitating disease, but it’s unclear what the issue is. She mostly lies in bed, sleeping or suffering from excruciating headaches. It’s not until the final act that Comer’s work is stellar.

When she becomes attached to a healthy newborn baby, her emotional connection to Spike and her memories of time spent with her father are linked.

These are the best scenes, and when Comer shines brightly. She is aided by the inclusion of Fiennes as the sympathetic doctor.

This proves that superior actors can make any film better as long as they infuse their talents into the script, which Comer and Fiennes do. They have tremendous chemistry during their limited scenes, offering humane and tender moments. Young Williams also does good work.

The cinematography is impressive. Lavish outdoorsy sequences in meadows or amidst a raging fire are lucid and colorful. An abandoned train set is dressed perfectly with dingy seats overgrown with plants and weeds. When the characters race through the aisles, there’s a realism to the scene.

The rest of the film has issues, especially weak subplots.

There’s a bit too much going on, so the result feels messy. Visions, memories, Jamie cheats on Isla while Spike watches, Spike pulls a knife on dad, the alpha is on the loose, a mysterious doctor, a fire, and other such additions are included.

Some work better than others.

A hunting expedition where Jamie teaches Spike to hunt is superfluous and clichéd. Doesn’t almost every post-apocalyptic film or television show feature someone showing someone else how to hunt?

The film also feels remarkably similar to television’s The Walking Dead or The Last of Us, suggesting that the filmmakers may have been riding a trend rather than creating their own original work.

Why make the father sympathetic, then non-sympathetic? Is it a way to enhance Isla’s and Spike’s bond?

The same occurs later when a kind Swedish soldier (Edvin Ryding) debuts, only to become unlikable minutes later. Is this to justify his head being torn from his body? An incredible scene by the way.

28 Years Later (2025) has some impressive story and technical tidbits, marginally giving it a recommendation for fans of the franchise. Otherwise, there isn’t enough quality content to entice new viewers.

2025 Films, Alden Ehrenreich, Amy Madigan, Austin Abrams, Benedict Wong, Cary Christopher, Horror, Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, June Diane Raphael, Justin Long, Toby Huss, Zach Cregger

Weapons-2025

October 5, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Weapons-2025

Director Zach Cregger

Starring Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, Amy Madigan

Scott’s Review #1,495

Reviewed October 5, 2025

Grade: A

Zach Cregger, who made his directorial debut with Barbarian in 2022, may have made his way to the big leagues with Weapons (2025), a highly original film rumored to have a follow-up prequel in the works.

One of his characters, the wicked Aunt Gladys (Amy Madiagan), is already becoming a household name and a potential Halloween costume idea.

The fabulous combination of tone, mystery, and genuinely frightening moments makes Weapons an edge-of-your-seat experience.

And who doesn’t find the disappearance of children a perfect horror premise?

Furthermore, the inclusion of chapters dedicated to each central character does wonders to retain the intrigue. Each character has a connection to others, making each subsequent chapter enthralling as viewers realize the connections.

Weapons is one of the best horror films I’ve seen in recent years.

Cregger masterfully gets the film off to a suspenseful and foreboding start with a quiet narration by a child. The youngster explains how one night at exactly 2:17 am, seventeen children left the safety of their suburban Pennsylvania homes and fled into the night, missing without a trace.

All but one child from the same class is included.

Alex (Cary Christopher), who has a strange connection to Aunt Gladys, is mercifully spared.

The rest of the town is left wondering what is behind their disappearance as fingers start to point towards suspects, most notably Justine (Julia Garner), the classroom teacher with a troubled past.

The ensuing witch hunt involving Justine is terrific. We tag along with the haggard teacher to the liquor store as she buys vodka in preparation for a boozy night alone in her small house, hoping to escape her troubles.

Alone, in the dark, and in a small town is frightening enough, but when a mysterious person knocks on her door and vandalizes her car, we feel vulnerable along with the character.

But is Justine as innocent as she appears?

When her chapter ends, and other characters like cop Paul (Alden Ehrenreich), James (Austin Abrams), a homeless drug addict and burglar, and Archer (Josh Brolin), a construction contractor and the father of Matthew, one of the missing children, get their backstories, the dots start to connect.

Aunt Gladys doesn’t appear for quite a while except in sudden, eerie background shots, but when she does, she immediately takes over the film.

As Alex’s elderly aunt (or is she only posing?), she quickly becomes the main antagonist of the film. Recently arrived in town, she is clad in a short, curly, ginger wig, large amounts of red lipstick, blue eyeshadow, fake eyelashes, and fake eyebrows, all behind thick-framed, tinted sunglasses.

On the surface, she appears to be an odd, old eccentric woman, but jovial and good-natured.

I wonder if Cregger patterned her after Minnie, played by Ruth Gordon, the eccentric woman revealed to be a witch in the 1968 masterpiece Rosemary’s Baby?

In one terrific scene, we almost see a sympathetic side to Aunt Gladys. She explains to Alex that neither a hospital nor water will help her recover from her terminal illness. There is a glimpse of kindness and humanity in her eyes before we recall her intentions.

There are also periodic jumps that come out of nowhere. When kindly principal Marcus (Benedict Wong) suddenly behaves out of character, we are startled. An odd woman brandishing a knife stumbles out of a doorway and lumbers to a car, cutting the hair of Justine.

Why, we wonder?

Many scenes are shot from a long-view angle without dialogue, which adds to the tension.

The finale combines a chase scene to end all chase scenes, blending horror and comedy in a way that oddly works similarly to what The Substance did in 2024. This might be the new trend in modern horror films.

Solidly infusing classic horror elements with mystery and intrigue, Cregger provides an unsettling experience that feels fresh and original.

He served as director, producer, writer, and co-musical scorer, proving that having only one chef in the kitchen often works wonders for creativity and structure.

Weapons (2025) has deservedly received critical acclaim while enjoying box office success, solidifying Cregger’s name on the cinematic map.

2025 Films, Billy Campbell, Brandy Norwood, Chase Sui Wonders, Freddie Prinze Jr., Horror, Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Jonah Hauer-King, Madelyn Cline, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Sarah Pidgeon, Slasher, Tyriq Withers

I Know What You Did Last Summer-2025

October 3, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

I Know What You Did Last Summer-2025

Director Jennifer Kaytin Robinson

Starring Chase Sui Wonders, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Madelyn Cline

Scott’s Review #1,494

Reviewed October 3, 2025

Grade: B+

The 2025 I Know What You Did Last Summer offering is pure nostalgia for fans of mainstream 1990s horror flicks. Those who love film franchises like Scream (1996-present) and Final Destination (2000-present) will be pretty pleased.

I adored watching the film and traveling back to my youth, although I was startled by the revelation that the young cinema stars of the 1990s are now almost 50 years old.

I only knew that Jennifer Love-Hewitt was returning by way of coming attraction trailers. Still, I had no idea that Freddie Prinze Jr. and Sarah Michelle Gellar were also returning, which added to my viewing pleasure.

It felt like catching up with old friends you haven’t seen in nearly thirty years.

While not a sequel to the 1997 original, it feels fresh with its clever ideas, twists and turns, and whodunit sensibilities, adding a refreshing dose of feminism that is timely.

This can undoubtedly be due in large part to being directed by Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, a female director who also co-wrote the screenplay.

Just like in 1997, when five friends inadvertently cause a deadly car accident, they cover up their involvement and make a pact to keep it a secret rather than face the consequences.

A year later, their past comes back to haunt them when one of the friends receives a threatening note, and they realize that someone knows what they did last summer.

As one by one the friends are stalked by a killer, they discover this has happened before, and they turn to two survivors of the legendary Southport Massacre of 1997 for help.

The most fun is the whodunit factor and trying to figure out who is the one donning a fisherman’s cloak and brandishing a hook to slice and dice their victims to ribbons.

Or does Robinson borrow a gimmick from the Scream films and make it two killers?

Of course, the victim of the original summer tragedy shares a link with the killers, and plenty of red herrings are in store, adding to the enjoyment.

The rulebook is slightly bent to allow for even more female empowerment than the original, wisely bringing Love-Hewitt’s Julie James back into the fold.

Now older, wiser, and tougher, and a college professor, she serves as a coach and mentor to Ava Brucks (Chase Sui Wonders), the leader of the new group of friends.

In a cool bit of inclusion, the character of Ava is bisexual, having a passionate bathroom encounter with a rocker chick while also having an ex-boyfriend, Milo (Jonah Hauer-King).

It’s also revealed that Julie and Ray Bronson (played by Prinze Jr.) were once married and have a tumultuous past. This is appealing to viewers familiar with the duo from the original film.

Putting the soap opera trimmings aside, the main highlight of I Know What You Did Last Summer is the accident during the first summer, the chase scenes, and the kill scenes, and the film wisely provides many of these.

When Teddy (Tyriq Withers) and Danica (Madelyn Cline) go to a dark graveyard to snoop for information, it doesn’t bode well for either when the fisherman lurks nearby.

These straightforward yet compelling sequences blend seamlessly with the finale aboard a yacht and later in a bar. The twists and turns, as well as the killer reveal, are well-written and character-themed, building on history and making sense.

I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025) successfully takes a stroll down memory lane while providing jumps, scares, and even a few laughs along the way.

1974 Films, Ann Prentiss, Barbara Ruick, Comedy, Drama, Elliott Gould, George Segal, Gwen Welles, Jeff Goldblum, Robert Altman

California Split-1974

August 25, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

California Split-1974

Director Robert Altman

Starring Elliott Gould, George Segal

Scott’s Review #1,493

Reviewed August 25, 2025

Grade: A-

California Split (1974) is heavily recommended for hardcore Robert Altman enthusiasts as a way of comparing his other, more well-known works with this effort.

It’s a minor film in his vast catalog, but a dissection of the very best of what the director offered the world of cinema and why cinephiles forever love him.

For novice Altman viewers, I’d start with The Long Goodbye (1973), Nashville (1975), or Gosford Park (2001).

Rich with fascinating, mostly minor or even background characters, combined with overlapping, largely improvised dialogue, this is Altman’s sweet spot. The dialogue crackles with brilliance and everyday conversation, especially around the casino tables.

California Split dives headfirst into a sad and sometimes depressing world of casinos, filled with prostitutes, derelicts, robust cashouts, and shattered dreams.

Footloose and fancy free, Charlie Waters (Elliott Gould) rooms with two high-class prostitutes, Barbara Miller (Ann Prentiss) and Susan Peters (Gwen Welles), and lives to gamble.

Along with his more reasonable friend Bill Denny (George Segal), Charlie sets out on a gambling streak in search of the big payday, regardless of the ramifications or hijinks they encounter along the way.

After troubles in Los Angeles, they quickly flock to Reno, Nevada, to see if their luck changes.

While Charlie and Bill have some lucky moments, they also have to contend with serious setbacks like owed debts and stolen money that threaten to derail their lofty ambitions.

California Split is a minor treasure.

Good chemistry exists between Gould and Segal, and they make compelling buddies. Charlie is the yin to Bill’s yang, but Bill is the character I care about most.

Explained to be married but separated, assumed because of his gambling addiction, Segal’s character is conflicted. Unable to help himself, he is nonetheless marginally sensible and aware of his problems.

After winning an enormous payout, instead of celebrating like Charlie does, Bill is instead morose.

He shares a tender moment with Susan, but after a feeble attempt at intimacy, he suddenly bails, leaving her shattered.

While the ladies don’t get as much screen time as the men, Prentiss and Welles also have a strong connection. With lesser acting talents or lesser writing, their characters could have been dismissed as floosies without any merit, but there’s a deeper understanding.

I yearned for more backstory, especially for Susan. Wounded and starved for love, she is my favorite female character.

Characters who appear in just one scene can leave a lasting impression.

The sassy receptionist, the angry, well-dressed woman in a bar who insults Bill with homophobic slurs, the female bartender (Barbara Ruick) in Reno observing Charlie and Bill’s conversations, and the fat lady at the casino table, each is fraught with endless possibilities.

How did each reach their lot in life?

Despite the unique characters and strong chemistry amongst the leads, California Split suffers from some aimlessness.

Occasional scenes are useless and meander incessantly. When the gents engage in a game of basketball with some strangers, there’s really no point to the scene.

The final sequence is compelling but also a letdown, as there is little satisfying climax or explanation of what happens to the characters in the future.

California Split (1974) is triumphant because it proudly celebrates Altman’s unique brand of filmmaking, showing his abilities as an iconoclast in the world of cinema.

It thrives on character over plot and the nuances of human behavior over dramatic story arcs. It displays his improvisational style and his ability to draw the viewer into a seedy world quite willingly.

Though not his most outstanding work, the mere essence of Altman is prevalent, making it a measured success.

1975 Films, Anthony Perkins, Berry Gordy, Billy Dee Williams, Diana Ross, Drama, Jean-Pierre Aumont, Musical, Musical Drama, Nina Foch

Mahogany-1975

August 20, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Mahogany-1975

Director Berry Gordy

Starring Diana Ross, Billy Dee Williams, Anthony Perkins

Scott’s Review #1,492

Reviewed August 20, 2025

Grade: B-

Watching Diana Ross, the ‘Queen of Motown Records’ and the lead singer of the legendary pop group, The Supremes, in a film role holds appeal.

A fabulous singing star, she had her sights set on continued film stardom with Mahogany (1975), having achieved respectability with Lady Sings the Blues (1972).

Ross portrays Tracy Chambers, a struggling Chicago fashion design student who rises from shop girl to popular fashion designer in Rome, after a chance meeting with hotshot fashion photographer Sean (Anthony Perkins) in the department store where she works.

Her love interest is aspiring politician Brian Walker (Billy Dee Williams), a local activist fighting against gentrification in their community.

But will her sudden success and diva antics destroy her relationship as well as her respect in the fashion world?

The highlights of the film are the many exterior sequences in and around Chicago and the swanky Rome locales featuring the Spanish Steps, the Colosseum, and other sophisticated locales.

Also, the soundtrack includes the single “Theme from Mahogany (Do You Know Where You’re Going To)”, sung by Ross, which peaked at number one on the Billboard Hot 100 chart in January 1976.

The song is a gorgeous ballad wisely recreated in different tones and styles throughout the film as well as during the credits.

Ross and Williams have a decent amount of chemistry, making an unlikely pair. Brian yearns to make a difference in the world, caring for the ‘little guy’ while earnestly forging a career in politics.

He puts up with Tracy’s ambitions because he is progressive, and their tender scenes of romance work well. When they spar, the tension builds into a believable crescendo, especially their blow-up fight in Rome.

This showcases the best acting from the pair, and the audience roots for them to reconcile.

It’s inspiring, especially for 1975, to see a black couple featured in a film front and center. Their lives are showcased instead of merely supporting white characters.

Other aspects of Mahogany are affected by various issues.

Ross, a singer, has hits and misses in the acting department. Sometimes she nails a scene, and other times she overacts. This may be the less-than-stellar writing, though, as her character progresses from likeable to diva bitch to likeable again in lightning speed.

It’s wonderful to see Anthony Perkins in another film role besides his signature role as Norman Bates in Psycho (1960). But his character, struggling with his sexuality, is possessive of Tracy, then has a death wish, all with underexplored and unsatisfactory themes.

Was being gay in the fashion industry such a big deal?

I wished for a more substantial role for Nina Foch, famous for her 1951 turn in An American in Paris. Playing a one-note, stuffy character like Miss Evans doesn’t give her much to work with.

It has a soap opera tone and a feeling that Ross is somewhat playing herself. Combined with a nagging, schmaltzy vibe and messy, plot-driven writing, it’s a film that’s all over the place, especially towards the conclusion.

The best example is when Tracy’s new benefactor, Count Christian Rosetti (Jean-Pierre Aumond), also in love with her, agrees without argument to let her give up her entire career and return to Chicago, and Brian.

This follows Tracy’s sudden epiphany that she no longer wants to be the biggest star in the world.

All in the final ten minutes.

Mahogany (1975) is a marginal success with a few highlights and a dismal failure for other reasons, leaving it hovering somewhere around the mid-line for mediocrity.

Oscar Nominations: Best Original Song, “Theme from Mahogany (Do You Know Where You’re Going To”).

1980 Films, Dean Jagger, Horror, Independent, Independent Horror, Lewis Teague, Michael V. Gazzo, Robert Forster, Robin Riker, Sue Lyon

Alligator-1980

August 18, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Alligator-1980

Director Lewis Teague

Starring Robert Forster, Robin Riker, Michael V. Gazzo

Scott’s Review #1,491

Reviewed August 18, 2025

Grade: B-

Alligator (1980) capitalizes on the Jaws (1975) and Jaws 2 (1978) craze with a similarly themed ‘creature that attacks humans’ idea.

The stalking musical score is essentially the same as Jaws, and the film includes a copied underwater camera shot of a victim in peril trying to reach a boat.

The late-night offering is adequate, though amateurish and cheaply made, with enough stock characters to make for a comical offering, whether intentional or unintentional.

The romantic chemistry between the two leads, Robert Forster and Robin Riker, is surprisingly genuine and sweet, which barely lifts this effort above mediocrity.

The kills are underwhelming and quickly become redundant as a leg or arm is chomped off a victim with little more than systematic style as the doomed person desperately attempts to escape being the giant alligator’s next meal.

Set in Chicago, the film follows Detective David Madison (Forster) and a reptile expert, Dr. Marisa Kendall (Riker), who team up to track an enormous, ravenous man-eating alligator flushed down the toilet years earlier as a baby.

The reptile terrorizes and attacks residents without capture after escaping from the city’s toxic sewers.

An inane explanation is provided, involving the alligator mutating to a humongous size due to feeding on animals used as test subjects for an experimental growth formula intended to increase agricultural livestock meat production.

The plot-driven story assuredly pairs David and Marisa as romantic counterparts from the get-go, so there is little doubt they will wind up together. A weak attempt at a spat between the couple is perplexing and a waste of time.

Thank goodness the actors have a decent amount of chemistry, which compels during scenes when they trapse around the metropolis trying to catch the reptilian murderer.

Marisa is written well as a self-assured, intelligent female doctor, though inexplicably, she lives with her overbearing mother. David has a mediocre backstory involving an incident where he should have saved his partner’s life but failed.

The death setups are outrageously satisfying as cookie-cutter stock characters quickly get their comeuppance. For example, the villainous Slade (Dean Jagger), an influential local tycoon responsible for the experiments, is crushed by a car that the alligator flattens.

This follows Slade’s selfish attempt to save his skin at the expense of another character, whom he locks out of his car.

Interestingly, Alligator features Jagger, an Oscar-winning actor (for 1949’s Twelve O’Clock High) and Oscar-nominated actor Michael V. Gazzo (for The Godfather Part II, 1974).

The grand finale is delicious B-movie style. The alligator goes on a rampage through a high-society wedding hosted at Slade’s mansion, eating a maid serving guests at the reception and killing Slade, the mayor, and Slade’s chief scientist for the hormone experiments, who was also his intended son-in-law.

The shrieking women and scrambling guests hilariously try to outrun the creature amid flying champagne glasses, wedding cakes, and delicate dining dishes.

This scene is worth the price of admission.

The rest of the experience is ludicrous as the alligator escapes notice in the city of millions. He crawls down urban streets and hides in dark alleys at whim, occasionally eating a villain or two.

Like any horror film of the 1970s or 1980s, Alligator perfectly sets up a sequel, a la Alien (1979), with a spawn being hatched in the sewer.

Playing more like a light comedy than a scary film, Alligator (1980) has moments of satisfaction. But most of it is an attempt to capitalize financially on an idea that has been used before, making it feel more like a ripoff movie than anything original.

1968 Films, Anna Quayle, Benny Hill, British, Children, Desmond Llewelyn, Dick Van Dyke, Fantasy, Gert Fröbe, International Fantasy, International Musical, Ken Hughes, Lionel Jeffries, Musical, Robert Helpmann, Sally Ann Howes

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang-1968

August 13, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang-1968

Director Ken Hughes

Starring Dick Van Dyke, Sally Ann Howes

Scott’s Review #1,490

Reviewed August 13, 2025

Grade: B

With a strong connection to James Bond, especially when looking beneath the most obvious details, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968) offers pure escapist fun in the fantasy genre.

Albert R. Broccoli, who produced many of the 007 films, also serves as producer, a surprise given the differing genres. Furthermore, Ian Fleming, who wrote a series of James Bond books, also wrote the novel Chitty Chitty Bang Bang in 1964.

The screenplay was written by the famous British children’s author, Roald Dahl (James and the Giant Peach and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory), whose handprint can be noticed as well.

I missed some of the subtle and not-so-subtle trimmings upon my viewing until taking a deeper dive into research. I also did not know the James Bond connection before watching the film.

One day, in rural England, young siblings Jeremy and Jemima meet the striking Truly Scrumptious (Sally Ann Howes), who falls for their widowed father, Caractacus Potts (Dick Van Dyke), despite coming from different backgrounds.

Potts tinkers with various oddball inventions, including the family’s noisy rebuilt car, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, which they name because of its unusual engine noises.

Caractacus tells Truly and the children a fantastical fable about the villainous Baron Bomburst (Gert Fröbe) and his evil designs on the Potts family car.

This becomes the central part of the film and the adventurous events that the family experiences.

For much of the film, events meander a bit more than I would have liked, and there seems not to be a clear direction. There were also too many over-the-top moments, mostly involving Caractacus’s wacky father (Lionel Jeffries) and various bumbling villain accomplices.

While enjoyable, the action felt silly and cartoonish.

After the intermission, the family ‘flies’ by car to a lavish castle owned by Bomburst in the childless nation of Vulgaria. There, they encounter frightened townspeople and the scary Child Catcher, wonderfully played by Robert Helpmann.

The colorful sets and art direction lend a helping hand to the secret of why there are no children in Vulgaria. We experience an odd yet witty toymaker played by Benny Hill and a splendid cat and mouse sequence involving human jack-in-the-boxes.

Later, a hidden grotto beneath the castle explains the mystery of where the town children are being kept and why.

While the Baron and Baroness (Anna Quayle) are unbelievably silly, the romance between Caractacus and Truly takes off and cements my investment in the pair.

Obviously and satisfyingly, they experience a happily ever after send-off after a couple of hiccups.

Van Dyke and Howes have dynamic chemistry despite Howes being a runner-up to Julie Andrews, who turned down the role, fearing it was too similar to Mary Poppins.

Fröbe (the diabolical title character from 1964’s Goldfinger) and the actor who played the familiar Bond character, Q (Desmond Llewelyn), make appearances.

The Chitty Chitty Bang Bang car is practically a character in itself, boasting special powers and gadgets reminiscent of numerous unique Bond cars, and serves as a good comparison.

Finally, the name Truly Scrumptious is a similar character name, albeit much more family-friendly, to Pussy Galore from Goldfinger.

Of course, since Roald Dahl is involved, it’s no wonder children are in peril.

Other than the award-nominated title song, which is easy to hum and hard to forget, the other songs pale in comparison to this standout. I’d give second place to Trudy’s earnest ‘Lovely Lonely Man, a decent song.

For a family-ready affair with deeper particulars for eagle-eyed viewers to spot, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968) is recommended around holiday time when other pleasant children’s musicals make their emergence.

The film would serve as a perfect warm-up act to the superior but companionable Oliver! (1968).

Oscar Nominations: Best Song- Original for the Picture, ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’

2025 Films, Adam Stein, Brec Bassinger, Horror, Kaitlyn Santa Juana, Richard Harmon, Teo Briones, Tony Todd, Zach Lipovsky

Final Destination Bloodlines-2025

August 9, 2025 scottmet99 Leave a comment

Final Destination Bloodlines-2025

Director Zack Lipovsky, Adam Stein

Starring Kaitlyn Santa Juana, Brec Bassinger

Scott’s Review #1,489

Reviewed August 9, 2025

Grade: B+

Final Destination Bloodlines (2025) is the sixth installment in the Final Destination film franchise, but the first in fourteen years, making the film feel more like a relaunch than a retread.

I’ll gladly see any new (or old) chapters since I enjoy the once inventive premise, which is now familiar territory and part of the brand.

The plots are based on the idea of a small group of people who escape impending death after one visionary individual has a sudden premonition and warns them about a major disaster that is about to occur.

Of course, Death cannot be tricked for long.

After avoiding their deaths seen in the visions, the survivors are later killed one by one in bizarre accidents caused by an unseen force.

The unique deaths are the fun part. From a garbage truck compactor, a malfunctioning MRI machine, and a deadly vending machine, the anticipation is in the killings and how they will be showcased.

Events begin in 1969, marking the best segment of Final Destination Bloodlines and one of the greatest in the series.

Young adults, Iris (Brec Bassinger) and Paul (Max Lloyd-Jones), embark on a lavish opening celebration of the Skyview, a high-rise restaurant tower that resembles the Seattle Space Needle. He awkwardly plans to propose, and she intends to reveal that she is pregnant.

The scene is shockingly tender and emotional since we immediately care about the couple, a pleasant surprise in the horror genre.

As the lovebirds sip champagne at the sophisticated bar, Iris is unsettled by the skyscraper’s lofty height and an unnerving feeling of dread and destruction as revelers hoot and holler on a glass dance floor.

Eventually, the tower collapses following a deadly chain reaction, killing everyone inside.

The Mad Men-style art direction and set design are magnificent and polished, adding worlds of style to the film. The pacing also works with appropriate tension throughout the extended sequence.

The action shifts to 2024, and a violent recurring nightmare plagues Stefani (Kaitlyn Santa Juana), revealed to be Iris’s granddaughter. She heads home to track down the one person who might be able to break the cycle and save the Reyes family from the grisly demise that inevitably awaits them.

The 2024 events are what you’d expect from the Final Destination films, and while decent, they don’t compare to the superior 1969 part.

The most fun is watching the cat-and-mouse setup of the presumed chain of events.

At the Reyes family barbeque, an accidental chunk of broken glass, a mislaid sharp rake, a fiery grill, and a torn trampoline are all possible death objects revealed as the family sips drinks and revels in outdoor activities and chatter.

Or are they merely red herrings?

The genius is forcing the audience to look around their own homes and decipher how many different objects could lead to their deaths.

Santa Juana is excellent at carrying the film, playing a relatable girl next door. Her likability keeps the audience invested in her as she attempts to break the cycle.

Other characters are more stock. The annoying tattoo artist cousin, the absentee mother looking for a second chance, and the uptight female cousin. They are all intended victims that Death will surely pluck.

They all play second fiddle to the bloody deaths, which are the main attraction.

Notably, a recurring character played by Tony Todd returns before the actor’s death, getting a lovely sendoff. His character’s appearance, in both 1969 and 2024, ties in deliciously with the history of the franchise.

Giving fresh breath to a formerly aging franchise, Final Destination Bloodlines (2025) is much better than expected. It adds charm and fulfillment, making it a treat for longtime fans of the past twenty-five years.

Welcome to my blog!1,513 reviews posted so far! I'm Scott Segrell and I reside in Stamford, CT. My site features hundreds of film reviews I have written since I launched the site in 2014. I hope you enjoy reading my latest reviews or searching for your own favorites to see if we agree. Please see my featured films of the month, and don't forget to utilize the tags and category links.