Tag Archives: David Cross

Waiting for Guffman-1996

Waiting for Guffman-1996

Director Christopher Guest

Starring Christopher Guest, Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara

Scott’s Review #1,145

Reviewed May 24, 2021

Grade: B+

Somehow, mocking local community theater troupes with questionable talent couldn’t be funnier with the right premise and an outstanding cast.

The added fun of midwestern traditions like barbecues, good manners, and spot-on imitations, put on display for humor, works well.

They should be celebrated and appreciated in Waiting for Guffman (1996).

The hysterical Best in Show (2000) is probably my favorite Christopher Guest film, but Waiting for Guffman is a hoot-and-hollering good time.

The ‘B+’ rating is largely due to Guffman serving as the opening act for the fab Best in Show. They can easily be watched back-to-back and perhaps should be for further cherishing.

When the town of Blaine, Missouri, approaches its sesquicentennial, the residents decide to celebrate with a musical revue titled “Red, White, and Blaine.”

Flamboyant director Corky St. Clair (Christopher Guest) is determined to return to Broadway success by casting untalented yet passionate performers.

Eugene Levy, Fred Willard, and Catherine O’Hara play the main cast members.

When Corky reveals that influential theater agent Mort Guffman will attend the opening, the cast is convinced they will receive accolades and Broadway appearances if they perform successfully.

They become titillated, flustered, and manic as the pressure of opening night approaches.

I daresay some folks from the Midwestern United States, or those faithful to the local theater, may not enjoy Waiting for Guffman, but I sure did.

Most of the characters are written as buffoons and lack any talent. The hysterics come because they think that they possess what they lack.

The aforementioned Guest, Levy, Willard, and O’Hara work so well together that they are the reason Waiting for Guffman is so damned funny! The comic timing between the actors is flawless.

Levy and O’Hara appeared together in the Canadian television sketch comedy series SCTV in the 1970s and 1980s before hitting the jackpot with the television series Schitt’s Creek in later years. Hence, a fun thing to do is to watch them together in whatever they appear in.

They are that good!

There are many stereotypes in Waiting for Guffman since Corky is written as a walking gay stereotype with mascara and flamboyancy. The irony is that he reportedly has a wife who is never seen, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions.

Given the casting and the director, Christopher Guest takes on acting and directing duties; the experience is largely improvisational and results in a witty outcome.

Guest treats his actors, and himself, to the famous Director Robert Altman’s mantra of letting his actors release and act on their terms, presumably knowing the characters better than anyone else.

The tactic works. Too often, comedies are stagey, and situations are forced in an attempt to make the viewer laugh because they think they are supposed to.

My favorite characters, unsurprisingly, are Ron and Sheila Albertson (Willard and O’Hara) as travel agents/amateur performers. They are zany and unpredictable, and their antics cannot be superseded by anyone else.

Recommended mostly for the artistic and the improv comedy crowd. The spoofs are all over the place, and fans of documentaries and talent shows can appreciate the gags.

Waiting for Guffman (1996) targets an intelligent audience craving fresh and original comedy. Being a cinema fan largely immersed in drama and horror, I was nonetheless won over.

The only drawback is that the film pales in comparison to the brilliant Best in Show (2000), which largely shares the same cast and tone, but it is still worth watching.

Obvious Child-2014

Obvious Child-2014

Director Gillian Robespierre

Starring Jenny Slate

Scott’s Review #387

70301275

Reviewed March 22, 2016

Grade: C+

Obvious Child is a 2014 independent comedy/drama nominated for a couple of Independent Spirit Awards, with mixed results.

It works on some levels but has an irritating underbelly and some unneeded components that ultimately give it a thumbs down.

The major success is star Jenny Slate, a real-life Brooklyn stand-up comic with immeasurable comic timing, who will hopefully become a rising star.

Slate starred in a 2009 short film of the same name before it became a full-length feature.

Slate stars as a twenty-eight-year-old Brooklynite, who moonlights as a stand-up comic in a dingy bar while working in a desolate bookstore that is soon closing.

Conversely, her parents are successful- her mother is a famed professor. When her steady boyfriend unceremoniously dumps her, she takes up with a handsome young man for a one-night stand filled with fun.

Predictably, she winds up pregnant and forges ahead with a plan to abort their child.

The abortion story is quite interesting since there is never a doubt about what will happen.

Unlike films that make abortion the main focus of conflict, Obvious Child wisely does not- every character supports, and even encourages her to have the procedure, including her mother and best friend.

Having been written and directed by women, this is intentional and a way of empowering women, which is one of the high points. If one is on the fence about the topic of abortion or is a pro-life stance, this film may be very tough to watch as its slant is made crystal clear.

Slate is the other high point of the film.

She exudes confidence and comic range. Jewish and slightly awkward-looking, she is not the leading-lady type, and this arguably makes her wit and sarcastic language even funnier.

She is a natural in comedy, and I hope she goes far.

Two slight props for me worth mentioning are the wonderful mention of the classic film Gone with the Wind (1939) and the setting of Brooklyn. This was a great nod to film history, and the setting gave Obvious Child an authentic New York City feel.

On the other hand, an utter annoyance about Obvious Child is the shameless and constant use of blatant and off-putting bathroom humor- not just once or twice, but numerous times.

How is this necessary to the plot? I can’t say, but I surmise the filmmakers deemed it necessary to show that females can give as good as males can.

Almost saying, “men can make poop jokes, why can’t women”? Why this is necessary for any film is beyond me, and it gives Obvious Child a crass, ugly feel.

The film also feels unrealistic.

Max is portrayed as Prince Charming. He can do no wrong, supports Donna in any decision she makes, is enamored by her sole being, and loves her unconditionally after only a one-night stand.

This would not happen in real life.

The fact that Donna is Jewish and quirky and Max is Christian and straight-laced is not explored. What conflicts would they undoubtedly face? Why were his parents not featured?

Highly uneven, with a great premise and an interesting slant on a still-controversial social issue, Obvious Child (2014) succeeds in the story department but fails in its uncalled-for use of potty humor to elicit cheap laughs.

Independent Spirit Award Nominations: Best Female Lead-Jenny Slate, Best First Feature