Beau Is Afraid-2023

Beau Is Afraid-2023

Director Ari Aster

Starring Joaquin Phoenix

Scott’s Review #1,538

Reviewed June 16, 2026

Grade: A

As a big fan of young director Ari Aster’s horror works like Hereditary (2018) and Midsommar (2019), which blend horror with surreal dark comedy, I was eager to see his latest effort, Beau is Afraid (2023).

Since Aster writes, directs, and co-produces the film, this equates to creative freedom and usually a better product, with fewer opinions in the mix to ruin the director’s vision.

Production company A24 is one of my favorites since they champion independent and edgy projects and showcase Aster and other creative directors’ work.

Aster shifts gears from horror to dark comedy with the wacky and unsettling Beau Is Afraid, a bizarre telling of one man’s paranoid universe.

In a word, it’s a mindfuck, and the less one knows about it, the better. I knew almost nothing about it, which made me appreciate it more and left me gleefully ambiguous, sharing the main character’s anxiety.

Joaquin Phoenix plays Beau Wassermann, a mild-mannered but paranoia-ridden character, as he embarks on a bizarre odyssey to get home to his mother’s house, battling his greatest fears along the way.

Anything and everything bad happens to Beau. As he prepares to head to the airport for his flight home, he carelessly leaves his key and suitcase outside his dilapidated apartment, giving an unseen thief the chance to steal both.

This sets off a series of events that lead him to use automobile transport to reach his mother.

But are events like a neighbor leaving notes imploring Beau to lower his music and a pair of menacing teenage girls real, or only in his mind?

Once Beau makes it to his mother’s ritzy house, events go completely bonkers as a headless corpse lies in a coffin in his mother’s living room and his female childhood friend, Elaine (Parker Posey), resurfaces.

Following the plot is extremely daunting, though flashback scenes of Beau as a newborn and a teenager offer minimal help in explaining his anxiety. But some clues prevail.

What I enjoyed and admired most about this film is its unpredictability and its unhinged plot.

Sometimes it’s okay not to fully understand a film’s story if there is enough going for it to justify the confusion, and in Beau Is Afraid, there is.

The filmmaking alone is admirable.

The film has a unique look, a cross between muted and glossy, that I also noticed in Hereditary.

During one sequence, Beau scrambles across a street to get home before being bludgeoned by a killer slaughtering a woman. So much happens in the scene, even in the background, with people running around and acting crazy all at a very fast pace.

The glamorous Beau’s mother’s set is brilliantly decorated, complete with a spiral wooden staircase and a pond-like exterior water feature running in the background.

These interesting intricacies make the overall package beyond impressive to the keen viewer.

Phoenix, now a legendary actor, is brilliant in the title role. Handsome and dashing yet an iconoclast and cerebral, he’s the perfect choice to star in something so warped.

Unknown if he wore a ‘fat suit’ or gained weight and became ‘middle-aged looking,’ but the actor is astounding as a regular dude with neurosis.

Rumor has it that Phoenix and Aster got along famously, undoubtedly making the film so dynamic.

Special mentions to Patti LuPone and Parker Posey, who give terrific supporting turns as Beau’s mother and Beau’s childhood friend.

Ari Aster is one of the most extraordinary new voices in modern cinema. He rejects traditional stories and plot devices in favor of unique, macabre storytelling.

At nearly three hours, he even breaks the rules regarding what’s considered an appropriate length for his films.

One can perhaps compare him to Quentin Tarantino of the 1990s for offering a fresh perspective on film and infusing his films with surrealism and thought-provoking themes.

Beau Is Afraid (2023) is an example of how exciting modern cinema can be, with an ingenious, visionary offering.

‘Salem’s Lot-2024

‘Salem’s Lot-2024

Director Gary Dauberman

Starring Lewis Pullman, Makenzie Leigh

Scott’s Review #1,537

Reviewed June 13, 2026

Grade: B-

Another attempt at resurrecting the well-known and scary 1975 Stephen King novel ‘Salem’s Lot results in a mediocre affair.

This is a shame because the novel, as well as Pet Semetary, scared the bejeezus out of me as a nerdy teen craving escapism.

The best ‘revival’ of ‘Salem’s Lot was a wonderful 1979 television miniseries that spanned nearly three hours. It lent credence to delving deeper into the robust and complex characters King created.

For a deep horror extravaganza, this is necessary.

Still, the 2024 offering of ‘Salem’s Lot is a watered-down approach to the original story, which it pairs with repeating glossy elements that were once extremely frightening and imaginative.

There’s little to no character development and a tepid romantic storyline that ultimately goes nowhere.

Overall, Stephen King doesn’t have a whole lot of luck with big-screen adaptations of his works. Carrie (1976) and The Shining (1980) are the two best, in my opinion.

Author Ben Mears (Lewis Pullman) returns to his childhood home, Jerusalem’s Lot (or Salem’s Lot), in search of inspiration for his next book, only to discover that his hometown is being preyed upon by a bloodthirsty vampire.

Gradually, most of the townspeople succumb to vampirism, explained later, because the town has no life anyway.

At the same time, Ben, his burgeoning love interest, Susan (Mackenzie Leigh), Doctor Cody (Alfre Woodard), schoolteacher Mark (Bill Camp), and eleven-year-old Mark Petrie (Jordan Preston Carter) must race against time to stop the madness from overtaking their beloved town.

As with many modern horror films, the first half of ‘Salem’s Lot is better than the second.

Pullman, son of famous actor Bill Pullman, and facially a dead ringer, is compelling in the lead role. An intelligent author, he returns to his hometown for inspiration, also recalling a horrific accident that killed both his parents.

He meets several interesting, on the surface anyway, characters, like the schoolteacher, the sheriff, and Susan, who, despite reading his last novel, doesn’t realize at first that Ben is the author.

Ben and Susan have a potential romance and a cool banter that envelops the audience. But that’s as far as we get with the pairing.

It’s peculiar that director Gary Dauberman keeps the time period in the mid-1970s for the automobiles featured, but little else is reminiscent of fifty years ago.

The characters all look very modern, from the hairstyles to the clothes, especially given the addition of a black female doctor and a prominent black family.

Kudos for the diversity, but it’s highly doubtful this would exist in a small rural town in the 1970s, especially not without a redneck or two around to cause chaos.

A fantastic sequence in the novel and miniseries, when pasty-faced schoolkid Danny (Nicholas Crovetti) is sacrificed, and returns to hover outside his pal Mark’s bedroom window, is neither thrilling nor scary. Instead, Mark casually casts Danny aside and runs to tell on him.

The villains also underwhelm.

Straker (Pilou Asbæk), a strange man from somewhere in Europe who opens an antique store in town and moves into the long-abandoned Marsten House, is scarcely featured and certainly not enough to get to know the character at all.

His vampire master, Kurt Barlow, who plans to create a vampire colony, is featured even less. He waits in a coffin in the basement of the house and snarls once or twice.

Nonetheless, the kills are fun if not unsurprising. Once benevolent characters turn into vampires and attempt to bite others.

The wackiest, probably unintentionally, is watching Susan’s mother bite her and later wield a shotgun to shoot anyone who has not turned.

But we don’t feel sorry for the victims because we never really knew them well enough to begin with. The quiet pacing is something the novel and the miniseries did exceptionally well.

By the conclusion, what started as a film with frightening potential turns into cheesy glowing crosses that sometimes work and sometimes don’t, and the character is reduced to saying a prayer in the hopes that the vampire won’t bite her.

‘Salem’s Lot (2024) is a rather tepid film with little to differentiate it from many other genre films and a weak effort in the many incarnations of King’s excellent book.

F1 The Movie-2025

F1 The Movie-2025

Director Joseph Kosinski

Starring Brad Pitt, Damson Idris, Kerry Condon

Scott’s Review #1,536

Reviewed June 12, 2026

Grade: C

Mysteriously nominated for Best Picture and three technical awards despite being a ‘formulaic’ Hollywood big-budget production, the recognition is the sole reason I decided to see F1 The Movie (2025).

Having heard the film was terrible, I hesitantly settled in to watch a with eleven hours to spare on a flight across the world.

Not a fan of auto racing, nor giving a hoot about FORMULA 1, the film is very similar to recent efforts like Ford v Ferrari (2019) and Rush (2013), both of which are forgettable.

Do we really need at least three major auto racing films in modern times? Apparently, a market still exists for this type of film.

While not downright horrible, and Brad Pitt holds appeal as a laid-back, aging race car driver, the film is too similar to other genre productions to garner much interest or to be remembered for long.

Sonny Hayes (Brad Pitt) is “the greatest that never was,” a derogatory term for a promising 1990s star whose career nearly ended in a track accident.

He never reached his full potential.

Thirty years later, he makes a living as a nomadic racer-for-hire when he’s approached by his former teammate, Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem), the owner of a struggling FORMULA 1 team on the verge of collapse.

Ruben convinces Sonny to return to FORMULA 1 for one last shot at saving the team and becoming the best in the world. He’ll drive alongside Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris), the team’s hotshot rookie, intent on making a name for himself.

This has a Rocky (1976) sports setup in which we root for the underdog to win the day.

As likable as Pitt is as the ‘star,’ even he can’t save this film from a myriad of cliches and easy setups.

There is little doubt that Sonny will finally become the  ‘greatest of all time’ (GOAT) before the credits roll, but not before facing animosity, accidents, setbacks, and all the other situations that always occur in a sports film before the hero enjoys the spoils.

Naturally, Sonny and cocky Joshua will become rivals and eventually friends. Laughably, after a fiery accident that nearly kills Joshua, his mother, Bernadette (Sarah Niles), blames Sonny for changing the strategy and causing her son harm.

The beautiful Kate McKenna (Kerry Condon), technical director for the team, predictably serves as a love interest of Sonny, despite in one scene insisting she never mixes work with romance, cut to Kate and Sonny passionately falling into bed for sex.

Finally, there are standard subplots of a rival of Ruben’s attempting to steal Sonny away for profit, and Kate scolding Sonny for being a lone wolf and encouraging him to be a team player.

The cliches and predictability are off the charts, which is exactly what I expected from F1 The Movie.

So, I don’t get the Best Picture nomination at all. My hunch is that, with the required 10 Best Picture nominees, F1 The Movie squeaked in because of its technical achievements, earning a solid 10th out of 10.

It didn’t make it in for a great screenplay.

On the other hand, the editing is solid, and the numerous racing scenes are shot with high-quality sound and quick cuts, which pair well.

Director Joseph Kosinski impresses with a single scene that offers a sliver of emotion. During a fiery crash scene, the sound is completely muted as Sonny runs over to the fireball encircling the racecar.

And with a black and Hispanic character in major roles and female characters in a ‘man’s world’ film, there is some diversity to celebrate.

As for the overall assessment for F1 The Movie (2025), I watched it in its entirety for two hours and thirty minutes during my long flight, and it passed the time.

Oscar Nominations: 1 win-Best Picture, Best Film Editing, Best Sound (won), Best Visual Effects

Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale-2025

Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale-2025

Director Simon Curtis

Starring Michelle Dockery, Hugh Bonneville, Elizabeth McGovern

Scott’s Review #1,535

Reviewed June 11, 2026

Grade: B

Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale (2025) is like comfort television set on a big screen.

The third in a planned film trilogy based on the popular television series that ran from 2010 to 2015, the film is satisfying while remaining safe and warm.

It concludes in the early 1930s, nearly a generation after the series debuted in 1912.

From a historical perspective, it’s compelling to see how world events progressed from the sinking of the Titanic when the series began to the begrudging acceptance of a divorced woman as the head of a household in the 1930s.

Separating an evaluation of the television series itself, and honing in on the three films, The Grande Finale ends at just the right time, feeling ever so stale at this point.

The absence of Maggie Smith as the Dowager Countess of Grantham is noticed, as her trademark wit and bitchiness cannot be replaced by any other character.

Let’s hope that creator Julian Fellows doesn’t go down the path that the slasher franchise Friday the 13th did in the 1980s and birth Downton Abbey: A New Beginning.

In this installment, the Crawley family and their staff enter the 1930s with the typical trials, tribulations, scandals, and drama they have overcome.

When Mary (Michelle Dockery) finds herself at the center of a public scandal over her divorce, the family also faces financial trouble, the threat of losing everything, and social disgrace.

The Crawleys must embrace change as the staff prepares for a new chapter with the next generation leading Downton Abbey into the future, which is at the heart of the finale.

The storylines, though modernized for the times, follow a familiar pattern, which is comforting for audiences. The soothing, methodical pace, lovely musical score, and familiar characters we have come to know and love over the years all return.

Even though there are problems for the Crawleys to tackle, nothing too heavy or startling emerges, maintaining a safe bubble for viewers to nestle in, keeping their security blanket intact.

Of course, lead actors like Dockery, Hugh Bonneville, and Elizabeth McGovern, joined by Paul Giamatti, are given the meaty storylines since they best represent the Crawley family.

Dockery as Mary, frequently known as being uptight, loosens up a bit amid her scandalous divorce, even giving in to desire and having a steamy one-night stand with a handsome stranger.

Meanwhile, Robert and Cora (Bonneville and McGovern) must grapple with the 1929 Wall Street stock market crash and the subsequent Great Depression.

The real-life world events the fictional stories are based on make the events more interesting than if writers had invented them.

A major positive is that nearly every character in the ensemble is given something to do, even if it’s only a crumb or two to chomp on.

For example, Carson (Jim Parsons) copes with retirement, while the cook, Mrs. Patmore (Lesley Nicol), embraces it and hands the reins to the young assistant, Daisy (Sophie McShera).

Popular couple John (Brendan Coyle) and Anna (Joanne Froggatt) Bates, eternally loyal to Robert and Mary, have a touching send-off.

Finally, the same-sex romance between Guy Dexter (Dominic West) and Thomas, a former butler at Downton Abbey (Robert James Collier), is explored as the men slowly become more comfortable admitting their relationship to friends.

Still taboo, the notion shows the progress that has occurred in the world over the decades.

The film ends perfectly, a wonderful tribute seen through Mary’s eyes as she takes over the Crawley estate. She sees those deceased family members she was once close to as she ponders the vast estate and the years gone by.

Violet, Matthew Crawley, and Lady Sybil Crawley all appear in archival cameos, making for a sweet and teary wrap-up.

Amid the comfort factor, the film doesn’t offer much that is new or different from the other installments. The new storylines aren’t particularly dangerous, and it’s clear things will be wrapped up in short order.

As nice as Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale (2026) is, let’s hope it truly is the finale. There’s something to be said about going out on top before the gas runs out of the tank.