All posts by scottmet99

Women in Love-1969

Women in Love-1969

Director Ken Russell

Starring Glenda Jackson, Oliver Reed

Scott’s Review #553

Reviewed December 20, 2016

Grade: A

Women in Love is a shamefully, by and large, forgotten gem- except for the obscure cinema lover- made in 1969.

The film is a British art film and is way ahead of its time. Despite the title, it is anything but a romantic comedy- quite dark in content. The film is adapted from a D.H. Lawrence novel of the same name.

The story is of two sisters, Gudrun and Ursula, living in a small mining town. They gather for a friend’s wedding, and each becomes enamored of a member of the wedding party.

Later, at a swanky dinner party, the girls meet the men. The film follows the sisters’ relationships with each man (played by Alan Bates and Oliver Reed) and the men’s relationships with each other.

The relationships are complex and filled with tender emotion, and some are pretty violent.

Women in Love is one of the first films to feature extensive nudity, but not in a gratuitous way.

The film explores themes of love, hatred, and the trials and tribulations of the English upper class.

The film is a love of mine because it is character-driven, told from each character’s perspective, and is quite an intense experience.

Glenda Jackson won the 1970 Best Actress Oscar- deservedly so.

Oscar Nominations: 1 win-Best Director-Ken Russell, Best Actress-Glenda Jackson (won), Best Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium, Best Cinematography

Golden Globe Nominations: 1 win-Best Director-Ken Russell, Best Actress-Drama-Glenda Jackson, Best Foreign Film (English Language) (won)

Inside Job-2010

Inside Job-2010

Director Charles Ferguson

Starring Matt Damon

Scott’s Review #552

Reviewed December 20, 2016

Grade: A-

Directly derived from the 2008 financial crisis, Inside Job (2010) explains what led up to it, the factors involved, and who is responsible for it.

The documentary is very important to see- if nothing else, it is a lesson in greed and corruption.

It is mainly divided into segments to make it less confusing, and the content is easily digestible. The basic concept is greed and how people are predisposed to being greedy.

Those responsible for the crisis and its subsequent effects on millions of people attempt to defend themselves and their actions to the end.

Sadly, they are still in power, as immoral human beings as they are.

Many times the interviewer will either catch the subject in a lie or leave them tongue-tied- one subject even threatens the interviewer.

There is a sense of satisfaction that erupts as they squirm and try to find quick ways to evade the questions.

Inside Job shows how Wall Street is incredibly powerful and how most politicians are puppets influenced greatly by it.

It is a sad and discouraging documentary, but incredibly honest and thought-provoking.

I left the theater feeling angry and depressed, but also that the filmmakers did an excellent job of educating viewers about the world’s woes.

Narrated by Matt Damon, Inside Job (2010) is one of the best documentaries I have seen in recent years.

Oscar Nominations: 1 win-Best Documentary Feature (won)

Friday the 13th: Part VII: The New Blood-1988

Friday the 13th: Part VII: The New Blood-1988

Director John Carl Buechler

Starring Lar Park Lincoln, Kevin Spirtas

Scott’s Review #551

Reviewed December 19, 2016

Grade: B-

The seventh installment of the legendary Friday the 13th franchise is enjoyable, yet predictable.

Props must be awarded to the creators for at least attempting a novel idea- this time, the “final girl” is not the damsel in distress type, but rather, gives as good as she gets.

Friday the 13th: Part VII: The New Blood (1988) is a decent offering in the horror genre and better than some of its companion films.

The main heroine is a telekinetic girl named  Tina Shepard (Lar Park Lincoln). Via flashbacks, we learn that Tina’s father had alcoholism and abused her mother.

When Tina’s telekinesis was unlocked ten years earlier, Tina caused her father’s drowning death, conveniently at Camp Crystal Lake.

Tina has harbored deep regret ever since and is now treated by Doctor Crews (Terry Kiser). The duo- along with her mother- decides to stay at the lake where a group of partying kids takes up residence next door.

None of them has any idea who Jason Voorhees is.

The beginning and end are ridiculous even by horror standards, as the action is way over the top and too convoluted to go into, but everything else is fine.

The cast seems a bit larger than in other chapters, which is great because that means more kills. Unfortunately, many of the kills have been edited to make an R rating. (I try to watch NR horror films- no edits).

My favorite kill by far is the “sleeping bag” kill. Awesome!!

Unfortunately, the DVD version of this film is severely edited from the theatrical version.

Also, Jason looks like a true monster in this one, and that is to be applauded. Stuntman Kane Hodder would begin a successful stint as the killer, and he looks the part.

Friday the 13th: Part VII: The New Blood (1988) is a fun popcorn horror flick.

The Band Wagon-1953

The Band Wagon-1953

Director Vincente Minnelli

Starring Fred Astaire, Cyd Charisse

Scott’s Review #549

Reviewed December 15, 2016

Grade: B

The Band Wagon, made in 1953, is a second-tier MGM (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) production- and by that, I mean it is not as stellar as other musicals of its time.

It lacks the majestic appeal of similar musicals like An American in Paris and Singin’ in the Rain.

Directed by Vincente Minnelli- a legendary music director of the 1950s, and starring Fred Astaire, The Band Wagon tells the story of a washed-up movie star trying to revive his career on Broadway.

He meets opposition from his co-star and prima ballerina, Gabrielle, played by Cyd Charisse, ironically, an actress who appeared in Singin’ in the Rain.

The Band Wagon is a fun movie, but it is not nearly as good as the film mentioned above. Instead, it is a pale imitator. While other musicals of similar style can be watched numerous times, The Band Wagon is a one-and-done affair.

The story starts slowly but gets much better towards the end.

The film has a few memorable musical numbers, notably “That’s Entertainment.”

Oscar Nominations: Best Story and Screenplay, Best Scoring of a Musical Picture, Best Costume Design, Color

The Bridesmaid-2004

The Bridesmaid-2004

Director Claude Chabrol

Starring Benoit Magimel, Laura Smet

Scott’s Review #548

Reviewed December 14, 2016

Grade: B+

A more modern offering by Claude Chabrol (many of his films were made in the 1960s and 1970s), his 2004 film entitled The Bridesmaid, continues the tradition of compelling, macabre storytelling.

It immerses the viewer in the strange behavior of the central characters as they obsess over each other in one way or another.

The film is in French.

The Bridesmaid contains two plots, one explored fully, the other not explored as much as might have been hoped- the latter being the more interesting of the two.

Philippe is his mother Christine’s only son and the only male in the household. His two other sisters live there as well.

Christine is divorced and works as a hairdresser.

The family is a rather typical one, save for a creepy, incestuous bond between Philippe and Christine, their very romantic conversations, and Philippe’s penchant for carrying around a head statue carved to resemble his mother.

He regularly sleeps with the statue and kisses it on the lips.

As the youngest daughter is to be married, Philippe meets and bonds with one of the bridesmaids, Senta.

The two embark on a torrid love affair and become inseparable. As their love flourishes, Senta becomes obsessed with her undying love for Philippe and asks him to kill a stranger as a way of proving his love for her.

This leads to confusion as Senta kills another character, thinking this is what Philippe wants. Philippe becomes both afraid and titillated by the young girl.

The main plot is very reminiscent of the Hitchcock classic Strangers on a Train (1951), in which one party is bloodthirsty and the other a more innocent victim, yet in Chabrol’s film, the other party suffers from emotional issues of their own.

Senta is unbalanced, and a mysterious figure from her past, Rita, described as her stepmother, appears a few times as she dances with her much younger partner.

A local girl mysteriously disappears early in the film, which may be a red herring or may be related to the events of the film.

I was more intrigued by the mommy/son angle, but perhaps that is Chabrol’s way of confusing the audience. Oddly, the duo has simmering chemistry, yet each character never fesses up to being obsessed with the other.

It is merely implied.

Philippe dislikes Christine’s beau, who figures prominently in the main story of Senta’s machinations, but I wanted more of Christine and Philippe.

Stylistically, The Bridesmaid is dreamy and builds at a slow momentum, similar to Chabrol’s earlier films. We are aware that the story will play out in a strange, interesting fashion, but we do not always know which road Chabrol might take, nor which plot points may or may not be revealed.

Perhaps less developed than some of his fantastic earlier efforts, but a recommended watch for someone in the mood for a morbid, left-of-center story to sink one’s teeth into.

Claude Chabrol is a director I admire greatly for his use of fascinating elements that keep the audience guessing about what is coming next, and that is a joy in itself.

The Believers-1987

The Believers-1987

Director John Schlesinger

Starring Martin Sheen, Helen Shaver

Scott’s Review #547

Reviewed December 12, 2016

Grade: B

The Believers is a very obscure film that I had never heard of before viewing it. Given that it was made in 1987 (not a great time for movies), I was skeptical about this one but was pleasantly surprised.

It has some edge to it, is mysterious, and is set in New York City- always a plus for me.

Martin Sheen- merely a youngster when this was made-plays a police psychologist, Cal Jamison, involved in a voodoo serial killer cult.

He moves from Minnesota to New York City following the death of his wife by electrocution when her coffeemaker malfunctions.

Is this key to the case or a red herring?

The plot is a bit convoluted as the serial killer targets Cal’s son, and when a frazzled police officer, Tom Lopez (Jimmy Smits),  takes center stage.

I did not find Smits all that believable in this role, and the film has a striking 1980s feel.

The locales, since it was shot in New York, are fantastic, and the plot contains some scares, surprises, and spooky effects along the way.

I was also very impressed by the satisfying ending.

The Believers (1987) is a very good thriller/horror film.

The Fighter-2010

The Fighter-2010

Director David O. Russell

Starring Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale

Scott’s Review #546

Reviewed December 11, 2016

Grade: A-

The Fighter (2010) is an excellent film. As a sports film, it has the inevitable clichés that make the entire sports film genre rather predictable.

But this film is a very well-done story and is based on real-life figures (the Ward brothers).

Tremendous acting by Wahlberg, Bale, and Melissa Leo, in the role of Mama Ward, a role of a lifetime.

The telling is a true story of Mickey Ward (Wahlberg), a boxer from Massachusetts, and his battle to stardom, dealings with family members, and his love life.

The characters may be ever so slightly overdone in the rugged, rough, Bostonian way, almost appearing New Jersey Soprano-ish instead of New England, but the message is clear: they are in the boxing world and are tough guys (and gals).

This film is much more character-driven than many similar sports movies, thank goodness, and the casting is spot-on.

There are the inevitable final boxing match and the standard reaction shots, but again sports films are riddled with clichés.

The real win is with the characters’ layered complexities as they love and hate each other.

Bale and Leo deserved their Oscars for their respective roles in The Fighter (2010), specifically Bale for the shocking weight loss and spot-on character imitation.

Oscar Nominations: 2 wins-Best Picture, Best Director-David O. Russell, Best Supporting Actor-Christian Bale (won), Best Supporting Actress-Melissa Leo (won), Amy Adams, Best Original Screenplay, Best Film Editing

I Am Love-2009

I Am Love-2009

Director Luca Guadagnino

Starring Tilda Swinton

Scott’s Review #545

Reviewed December 11, 2016

Grade: A

Tilda Swinton shines in I Am Love,  an amazing Italian film from 2009 that I wish received wider recognition, but alas, some of the best films do not receive their due.

Swinton stars as a matriarch of a wealthy Italian family who owns a successful business.

To make this film feel authentic, it was shot in and around Milan and features a highly stylish, exquisite look. It is a grand film with high-class set pieces and a great look.

I do not hesitate to categorize it as an artistic, female version of The Godfather (1972) because it is that good.

It focuses on the family as a whole but more so on Swinton’s character, who is bored and unhappy with her life and yearns for passion and feeling.

One day she meets a friend of her sons, and drama ensues.

The boy is only half her age, but they share a passion that awakens her from her doldrums. The conflict in the film is how the affair looks to society and affects the family business- not to mention being detrimental to her marriage.

I Am Love (2009) is a great film that should be discovered by those looking for a gorgeous film with great drama.

Oscar Nominations: Best Costume Design

Fantasia-1940

Fantasia-1940

Director James Algar, Various

Starring Leopold Stokowski, Walt Disney

Scott’s Review #544

Reviewed December 11, 2016

Grade: B+

Before viewing this 1940 gem by Walt Disney, I was naive about precisely what Fantasia was about. Indeed, I had heard of it and knew it was an animated production, but I was also mystified by it. Now embarrassed, I realize what a creative treat I missed out on.

Better late than never.

I expected a Walt Disney animated story like Snow White or Pinocchio, but this assumption mistook me. While the film took me a bit to get into, it is a marvel and quite extravagant.

The combination of classical pieces and the animated story is brilliant and visually impressive. There are eight pieces in total, all with stories to tell.

Animated films are not typically my genre of choice, but this one impressed me quite a bit if nothing more than the imagination involved.

A Fantasia reboot emerged in 2000.

Lovely, Still-2008

Lovely, Still-2008

Director Nik Fackler

Starring Ellen Burstyn, Martin Landau

Scott’s Review #543

Reviewed December 11, 2016

Grade: B+

Oh, how I wish this movie had gotten more attention!

Lovely, Still (2008) is a small, independent venture that is Christmas-themed and set in Omaha, Nebraska.

It stars Martin Landau and Ellen Burstyn as an older couple who fall in love.

Landau is Robert, a lonely older man interested in dating again, who meets and falls in love with Mary, the mother of his next-door neighbor.

Before you start thinking Lifetime television movie, the last thirty minutes of the film will shock and fascinate you.

A guttural reveal takes this film to a completely different place during the climax, making it a heart-wrenching and powerful experience.

Landau and Burstyn are wonderful actors who mesmerize scenes together. They have a sweet innocence and are in glee, like teenagers experiencing first love.

My only criticism is that the first half of Lovely, Still is a bit slow, but this can be forgotten as the film kicks into high gear.

Also, some wonderful camera shots from novice director Nik Fackler.

Manchester by the Sea-2016

Manchester by the Sea-2016

Director Kenneth Lonergan

Starring Casey Affleck, Michelle Williams

Scott’s Review #542

Reviewed December 11, 2016

Grade: A

Manchester by the Sea (2016) is a beautiful film.

Told from a slow build-up to a crescendo and a big reveal mid-stream about one of the character’s pasts, it takes time, which is why it is so compelling.

The audience slowly becomes familiar with the characters, making them rich with nuances. They care about them and their predicaments, just as good, solid storytelling should.

The film is a slice of life, dark drama, but I did not find it to be a downer in the least bit—instead, a film with rich writing and great characters. A good movie makes you care for the characters like real people.

Casey Affleck is excellent as the lead character, Lee Chandler. In the film, he plays a janitor who lives a mundane life in Quincy, Massachusetts, tending to apartment buildings. He calmly deals with indifferent, angry, or odd tenants.

Affleck portrays this man with reserve and occasional outbursts of rage. His anger is confusing, but as the story unfolds, we begin to understand what this man has been through and the reasoning behind his anger, even though he is a good person.

Lee receives a call one day with news that his brother, Joe, has died.

Kyle Chandler plays Joe through many flashbacks throughout the film. Upon Joe’s death, Lee returns to Manchester (where he formerly resided) and is told he will be the guardian of his sixteen-year-old nephew, Patrick (Lucas Hedges).

In the mix are the characters of Joe and Lee’s ex-wives- Elise and Randi (Michelle Williams), playing small yet pivotal roles.

The film is dark, and many characters either suffer from emotional trauma, neurosis, or some other maladies, either physical or emotional.

The slice-of-life analogy comes into play. Everyone can relate to these characters in some way, and most people have lived in towns like this and/or have suffered crappy turns of events in life.

When Lee returns to Mansfield, he is a familiar face with a hint of mystery and history. Mansfield is a small town; everyone knows each other’s business, and the characters are hardened, blue-collar, and rugged individuals.

In addition to Affleck’s compelling performance, Williams must be mentioned. She gives a tremendous, heart-wrenching performance as a good woman in pain, trying to carry on and do the right things, forging some adequate existence, as is Lee.

Anyone who has gone through pain (which is everybody) can relate to these characters.

The supporting cast, including even the tiny characters, is perfectly cast and has hearty Boston-type accents that I loved. From Joe’s wife to Patrick’s girlfriend’s mother to various other walk-on characters, each has a vulnerability mixed with toughness.

It is as if life has been challenging, and they are wary of trust, yet they help each other and stick together.

The characters are a major positive to Manchester by the Sea.

Many reflective moments abound within the film, and we are often given scenes of Lee driving down the highway deep in thought. Or long shots of the vast Atlantic Ocean, where fishing is a large part of the character’s lives.

Fishing boats and waves are monumental in the film.

These are not throwaway scenes but interesting, compelling moments rich with meaning.

During the best sequence of the film, when a startling event occurs, the scenes are mixed with classical and operatic music, giving the scenes and the shocking revelations power and meat.

It is heavy stuff but also beautiful, with a compelling musical score.

Not to be drowned by the heavy drama, Manchester has some quirky, dry humor moments. When Joe is initially told about his heart condition, he and his father unintentionally call his female Asian doctor by the wrong name.

When family friends host a party following Awaken, they awkwardly misunderstand each other when they attempt to fix Lee a plate of food. Finally, nobody can find the deceased Joe’s belongings at the hospital. These awkward moments add some comic relief to the film.

I adore well-crafted, emotional, compelling family dramas. Too often, they are cliche-ridden and highly predictable.

Manchester by the Sea (2016) has brilliant writing, top-notch acting, and intricately layered characters.

This film has it all.

Oscar Nominations: 2 wins-Best Picture, Best Director-Kenneth Lonergan, Best Actor-Casey Affleck (won), Best Supporting Actor-Lucas Hedges, Best Supporting Actress-Michelle Williams, Best Original Screenplay (won)

Independent Spirit Award Nominations: 1 win-Best Feature, Best Male Lead-Casey Affleck (won), Best Supporting Male-Lucas Hedges, Best Screenplay, Best Editing

Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens-2015

Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens-2015

Director J.J. Abrams

Starring Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill

Scott’s Review #540

Reviewed December 8, 2016

Grade: B

As a youngster who grew up on the original three Star Wars films (admittedly, I cannot keep track of, nor care enough to learn, the franchise’s exact chronological order), the 2015 reincarnation feels very nostalgic.

Star Wars (1977), The Empire Strikes Back (1980), and Return of the Jedi (1983) were magical films for a kid.

I saw each one in theaters.

Sadly, The Phantom Menace (1999) was a rather forgettable endeavor and did nothing to draw new fans to the franchise or keep existing fans engaged.

Taking center stage in this installment are beloved stalwart characters Han Solo (Harrison Ford), Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher), and Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) in a nostalgic trip down memory lane.

A slight gripe is the shamefully underused status of one of these characters.

The visual effects are impressive, the main villain is okay, and the action sequences are adequate, but the ode to history keeps longtime viewers engaged most.

In a way, Star Wars: The Force Awakens is aptly titled as it is a rebirth of sorts for the storied franchise.

Legendary actor Max von Sydow is shamefully underutilized, with a throwaway role in the film’s opening sequence.

He resembles the late, great Guinness, who was famous again in the 1970s when he appeared in the first Star Wars.

A coincidence?

Filmmakers are aiming for a modern reboot of Episode IV (1977).

The main character, Rey (Daisy Ridley), is meant to be the new Luke Skywalker, a Jedi hero known across the galaxy and missing for years. Rey has special powers and is accompanied by her sidekick droid, BB-8, a similar character to R2-D2.

The villain is Kylo-Ren, son of Han Solo and Princess (now General) Leia, and reminiscent of Darth Vader.

The film is a classic good-versus-evil tale as the evil First Order battles the good Resistance.

I enjoyed the good storytelling most of all, and prominent roles for Han Solo and Leia were good choices for the storied franchise. Newcomers Rey and her love interest, Finn, are appealing, as is fighter pilot Poe, played by Oscar Isaac.

Reportedly, this film kicks off another trilogy, so we will undoubtedly see more of these characters.

I could not help but notice the Nazi similarities of the First Order and their soldiers, the Stormtroopers. Possessing a red quality and a Nazi-like salute to their supreme leader, they even look German in appearance.

Kylo Ren, raven-haired, pale, and clad in a black cape, was clearly inspired by Darth Vader, especially in his masked appearance.

He almost could have been his son.

Set thirty years after the original Star Wars, the plot is similar, and I think this is a wise move: it introduces the franchise to a new audience while staying true to the rich history of the central characters and their offspring.

Han Solo and Leia discuss their love affair, past adventures, and their son, who has been hypnotized to the dark side. They struggle to concoct a way to rescue him and hope to persuade him that aligning with the Resistance is the only way.

Favorite scenes include the ultimate showdown between Rey and Kylo-Ren. Set in a snowy, wintry forest, the scene is visually gorgeous, with their glistening, glowing lightsabers, as are many scenes in one battle station or another.

The re-appearance of comical C-3PO is darling.

As with the original Star Wars, humor is mixed in to lighten the mood.

Han Solo and his dedicated sidekick Chewbacca gently spar, and when Han Solo takes the group to a saloon filled with interesting creatures, the scene is light and fun. 

The real drawback for me is that the film isn’t all that compelling, aside from the nostalgia. It is a classic battle of two wills, but nothing new and exciting.

Sure, there are a few new characters, but the plot is rather basic and what one would expect. 

I am not truly invested in the franchise, despite zillions of die-hard fans who are fanatics about the films and their intricacies, so this is more an opinion than a criticism of its merits.

Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015) will undoubtedly please fans and introduce new ones to a galaxy and the “force.”

A satisfying trip down memory lane.

Oscar Nominations: Best Original Score, Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, Best Film Editing, Best Visual Effects

A Wedding-1978

A Wedding-1978

Director Robert Altman

Starring Desi Arnaz, Jr.

Scott’s Review #539

Reviewed December 17, 2016

Grade: A

A Wedding (1978) is an obscure, brilliant gem penned and directed by Robert Altman, a film genius and one of my most adored directors.

I love most of his movies, and A Wedding is no exception.

The creative way Altman weaves intersecting storylines and dialogue, creating a real-life tone, gives his films immense realism.

In A Wedding, he takes a basic life event and turns it into a well-nuanced, fascinating, comical, yet dramatic story.

He is known for having enormous casts (in A Wedding, there are 48 principals!), but every character serves a purpose.

The viewer will feel like a fly on the wall at a real wedding.

Altman’s actors primarily improvise their dialogue, speaking at the same time, which lends a realistic edge. I adore this quality.

The film is a satire- people either love or loathe attending weddings, and Altman’s film caters to the latter. He creates a setting, from the ceremony to the reception, riddled with awkward moments and social gaffes.

In pure satirical soap-opera fashion, two wealthy families gather at a lavish estate for the ceremony to begin. Hilarity ensues when the corpse of the matriarch of one family lies in her bed, nobody realizing she is dead.

Other hijinks include the revelation of a nude, life-size portrait of the bride, the caterer falling ill, and a tornado wreaking havoc.

Slowly, the families reveal secrets as alcohol flows and the characters become entangled in perilous situations.

Altman does it again, creating a masterpiece based on real-life situations most can relate to.

Golden Globe Nominations: Best Supporting Actress-Carol Burnett

How to Train Your Dragon-2010

How to Train Your Dragon-2010

Director Dean DeBlois, Chris Chambers

Starring Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera

Scott’s Review #537

70109893

Reviewed December 5, 2016

Grade: B-

How to Train Your Dragon is a decent but less-than-spectacular animated film from 2010.

Undoubtedly targeted toward youngsters, it contains G-rated elements, and I may have enjoyed it more if I were nine years old.

The film is loosely based on the British book series of the same name.

A subsequent sequel was released in 2014.

From a storytelling perspective, the film tells a story with a nice message.

Young Hiccup (Jay Baruchel) is a teenage Viking on the cusp of becoming a man. As a ritual, he is expected to kill a dragon to prove his worth as a warrior to his tribe.

When put to the test, Hiccup finds that instead of desiring to kill the dragon, he wants to befriend it. Of course, the traditional Vikings want no part of any unity between the tribe and dragons, who are long-time enemies.

Mixed in with the main story is the inevitable love story between Hiccup and Astrid (America Ferrera), a tough Viking girl.

There are way too many endless aerial battles between the tamed and vicious dragons, so it begins to feel more like an effort to fill time rather than furthering the main plot in any way.

This film has a nice message of kindness and togetherness, but is very predictable and takes no risks.

There is nothing wrong with it, and animated fans may look at it differently, but to me, How to Train Your Dragon (2010) is quite run-of-the-mill.

Oscar Nominations: Best Animated Feature Film, Best Original Score

JFK-1991

JFK-1991

Director Oliver Stone

Starring Kevin Costner

Scott’s Review #536

60031474

Reviewed December 4, 2016

Grade: B+

JFK (1991) is a very well-made film. Still, it must be taken with a grain of salt, as the director, Oliver Stone, reportedly took many liberties, and the film is open to interpretation about what is true and what is embellished.

At three hours and twenty-six minutes, the film is epic in proportion.

The film recounts the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy through the eyes of a former District Attorney from New Orleans, James Garrison, played by Kevin Costner.

Garrison filed charges against New Orleans businessman, Clay Shaw (Tommy Lee Jones), and in his view, was in cahoots with Lee Harvey Oswald to kill the president.

Stone suggested that President Lyndon B. Johnson was involved in the coup, which led to considerable controversy.

The plot is quite intricate and at times tough to follow, but the editing alone is impressive. I loved the authentic, real-life footage that Stone immerses throughout the film.

As we know, the assassination in 1963 was tragic and fraught with controversy that still abounds today.

Stone was wise to make a film of this caliber despite the lack of clarity about what is true and what is not.

I guess we may never know.

Oscar Nominations: 2 wins-Best Picture, Best Director-Oliver Stone, Best Supporting Actor-Tommy Lee Jones, Best Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published, Best Original Score, Best Sound, Best Cinematography (won), Best Film Editing (won)

Fantasia 2000-2000

Fantasia 2000-2000

Director James Algar, Various

Starring Steve Martin, Bette Midler

Scott’s Review #535

60000436

Reviewed December 4, 2016

Grade: B+

Fantasia 2000 is a visually stunning remake of the 1940 Disney film. The modern version was produced by Roy Disney, nephew of the famous Walt Disney.

There are nine segments in total, each set to a classical music piece. Masterpieces such as Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5 and Gershwin’s Rhapsody in Blue are featured.

The Rhapsody piece is a gorgeous story of four individuals who dream of a better life in 1930s New York City. The four do not know each other, but their lives intersect in unique ways.

A celebrity introduces each segment: Steve Martin, Angela Lansbury, Bette Midler, and Quincy Jones, who offer helpful thoughts and interpretations.

The final piece, in particular, is both moving and breathtaking. Firebird Suite-1919 version- by Stravinsky tells of a sprite (an ethereal entity), awoken by her companion, an elk, as a volcanic spirit has erupted in the peaceful forest, burning it down.

The sprite must work to rebuild the peaceful land.

It is an earnest, heartbreaking piece.

Being somewhat of a film traditionalist, I prefer the original slightly, but this version is great.

Fantasia 2000 is wonderful to look at.

The Godfather: Part III-1990

The Godfather: Part III-1990

Director Francis Ford Coppola

Starring Al Pacino, Diane Keaton

Scott’s Review #533

60011153

Reviewed December 3, 2016

Grade: B+

The Godfather: Part III, released in 1990, has traditionally drawn criticism for not living up to the two preceding epics.

Sofia Coppola, who plays Mary, Michael Corleone’s daughter, in particular, has borne the brunt of the attacks.

No, The Godfather: Part III isn’t on the level of the others, but it is pretty damned good on its own merits and a capable mob epic that concludes the franchise satisfyingly.

The film’s central themes are Michael’s continued desire to leave the mafia and religion, and the role a the Catholic Church.

Some backstory on the film’s making: Coppola had a non-expiring offer to create a third installment of the saga ever since 1974, when Part II was released.

After a financial crisis, Coppola agreed to do the follow-up in 1990.

Julia Roberts was to play the ever-crucial role of Mary (now a coming-of-age young lady), but she dropped out. Winona Ryder was then cast and bailed at the very last minute.

Out of necessity, Coppola’s daughter, Sofia, was cast and had little time to prepare or much acting experience (she would later become an acclaimed director, which better suited her talents).

a with the other epics, a major event launches the film: Michael (Pacino) is named Commander of the Order of Saint Sebastian in a lavish ceremony at St. Patrick’s Old Cathedral.

Michael is approaching age sixty and semi-retired, leaving his business dealings mainly to Joey Zasa in New York, who has ravaged what the Corleone family once built.

Many characters, Kay, Mary, Tony, and Connie, are reintroduced, and new characters such as Vincent Mancini (Andy Garcia) and Don Altobello (Eli Wallach) appear in a flurry of new storylines.

It is like a big, grand soap opera, with wonderful, rich writing.

I was immediately impressed by the neat cinematography; the camera captures wind-swept leaves and an artistic introduction to the film, as well as characters from the first two films, either in cameo roles or as small characters, a great touch for continuity and history.

Coppola does a fantastic job of providing little updates on these characters during a party.

For example, we learn that Vincent is Sonny’s deceased, illegitimate son, and that his mother, Lucy Mancini, appears in a scene. (Clever viewers will remember Sonny and Lucy’s torrential affair in the bathroom during The Godfather (1972), and it is suggested that this produced Vincent).

The film mentions that Tom Hagen (Robert Duvall) has died, though his wife and son appear, and Coppola treats us to a myriad of flashbacks (Apollonia, a young Michael, and Kaye).

These nuances make The Godfather: Part III a film filled with cool little aspects that warm the loyal viewer.

The main story, Michael takes Vincent under his wing and tries to steer the family clear of criminal ties, is interesting, if not spectacular.

Connie rises from a battered mafia wife, raising kids, to a major player in the family, just as women progressed from the 1940s to the 1980s when the story takes place.

She even feeds her godfather a poisoned cannoli!

Michael, Vincent, and Connie get involved with the Catholic Church, bail it out (the real-life Papal banking scandal is linked to the story), and strike a deal for a major stake in the real estate company Immobiliare.

In-fighting between the major crime mob bosses leads to several bloody massacres throughout the film, on the streets, in Atlantic City, and finally, in the Sicilian Opera House.

The pairing of cousins and lovers, Vincent and Mary, never really works, nor does Bridget Fonda’s one-two-scene appearance as Grace Hamilton, a brief dalliance for Vincent.

Also, the exclusion of the loyal family attorney, Tom, is a glaring omission.

So the film does contain a few negatives.

In a nutshell, The Godfather: Part III (1990) is a very good, epic crime drama even without the Godfather name. To measure up to the glory of Parts I and II is impossible.

With the rich Corleone family history and the intricate relationships between the characters, it’s a treat for fans.

There has been a Part IV, nor should there ever be, as the film’s conclusion provides a satisfying wrap-up to the saga.

Oscar Nominations: Best Picture, Best Director-Francis Ford Coppola, Best Supporting Actor-Andy Garcia, Best Original Song-“Promise Me You’ll Remember”, Best Art Direction, Best Cinematography, Best Film Editing

Golden Globe Nominations: Best Picture- Drama, Best Director-Francis Ford Coppola, Best Actor-Drama-Al Pacino, Best Supporting Actor-Andy Garcia, Best Screenplay, Best Original Score, Best Original Song-“Promise Me You’ll Remember”

Saw V-2008

Saw V-2008

Director David Hackl

Starring Tobin Bell

Scott’s Review #532

70098905

Reviewed December 1, 2016

Grade: B

The Saw franchise films are fun, bloody, late-night flicks.

It is quite helpful if you see them close together, and in sequence, as they either continue or backtrack to previous films.

Past knowledge is very helpful.

Saw V (2008) is no exception, as we learn the hows and the whys of serial killer Jigsaw (Tobin Bell), an apprentice, and detective Mark Hoffman (Costas Mandylor).

What would possess this man to follow in the footsteps of Jigsaw?

In their heyday, the Saw films were intriguing and more cerebral than the standard slice-and-dice ’em offerings.

I like these films because there is usually a plot twist or some other surprise connection to an earlier entry to look forward to.

Also, the victims are not merely innocent but are in the wrong place at the wrong time, nor are they killed for the sake of killing.

They typically have embezzled someone, maimed an innocent party, or caused someone pain in some fashion, so the audience does not feel sorry for them, making their various tortures tolerable to watch, if not satisfying.

In Saw V, as far as the kills go, we are treated to somebody being sliced in half, a decapitation, another being blown to bits by a detonating bomb, bloodletting, a crushing to death, and various other forms of mutilation.

This is all well and good, but by Part V in a franchise, even the most clever of stories run out of gas, and by this point, the series is feeling a little tired, although still enjoyable for the puzzle of story connections.

Saw V (2008) is a very bloody film, so it is not intended for the squeamish.

Exit Through the Gift Shop-2010

Exit Through the Gift Shop-2010

Director Banksy

Starring Banksy

Scott’s Review #531

70132200

Reviewed December 1, 2016

Grade: B-

Exit Through the Gift Shop is a 2010 documentary. I am a fan of documentaries if the subject matter interests me.

The topic of this documentary is street art, which is not especially appealing to me, but it is also nice to be open to new experiences and perhaps learn a thing or two.

Banksy, who both directed and stars in the documentary, is the main focus, and the film tells his story.

We meet a man from Los Angeles who carries a camera wherever he goes. Through his cousin in France, he decides to do a documentary on street artists.

He is fascinated by the mysterious and secretive Banksy until he manages to meet him one day. He then begins filming Banksy’s street art.

So the documentary has a plot and isn’t the standard type of documentary.

Some claim that the film is staged and that a bit of a hoax has run rampant, but those allegations have not been proven.

I respect this feature as a nice, telling documentary, but it drags a bit, which may be because I’m not very interested in the topic.

Great for anyone into street art.

Oscar Nominations: Best Documentary Feature

Independent Spirit Award Nominations: 1 win-Best Documentary (won)

Piranha 3D-2010

Piranha 3D-2010

Director Alexandre Aja

Starring Elisabeth Shue

Scott’s Review #529

70108986

Reviewed November 29, 2016

Grade: C-

2010’s Piranha 3D is a tongue-in-cheek horror comedy that saves itself from being complete drivel with a sense of humor.

Remarkably, it stars some decent talents: Richard Dreyfuss, Ving Rhames, and Elisabeth Shue.

The film is pure fluff, not high art in the least, with no message or purpose.

The film is terrible, but kind of fun at the same time. It’s camp and shouldn’t be taken seriously at all.

The plot is simplistic and standard horror fare. A school of piranhas is unleashed after an underwater earthquake, kills a fisherman, and ravages a college vacation party on a lake.

The college kids come to Lake Victoria to party and lounge on the beach, and typically are dressed precariously. They are unceremoniously ripped to shreds by the angry and hungry killer fish.

Shue and Rhames must have hit rough times and have required a paycheck to star in this. They play a Sheriff and Deputy, laughably unbelievable, as they try to protect the beach-goers from a grisly fate.

Dreyfuss plays a ridiculous and unnecessary role as the aforementioned fisherman.

On a serious (and sour) note, the objectification of women is shocking in this day and age. Haven’t we seen enough stereotypes in one lifetime?

A few cool kills and humor, but Piranha 3D (2010) is a dumb, popcorn horror film.

The Last Exorcism-2010

The Last Exorcism-2010

Director Daniel Stamm

Starring Patrick Fabian

Scott’s Review #528

70136074

Reviewed November 27, 2016

Grade: B+

The Last Exorcism (2010) is an enjoyable independent horror film.

I found it unique and creative, and it’s shot in a documentary style, so there is a level of watching something new and different in the horror world that I appreciated.

Hand-held or documentary footage has been used before, but this film feels fresh and not cliché-driven.

Horror master Eli Roth produced the film.

A doubtful preacher (Reverend Cotton Marcus) who lives in Louisiana sets out to perform his final exorcism with a documentary crew in tow, only to find a girl who is possessed by the devil.

Cotton is assumed to be a con artist, so we doubt he actually can help the girl, which is what makes the film so interesting and unpredictable.

What will happen next? Could the girl or her family be frauds?

The film is really scary and contains a dark, creepy ambiance. It reminds me a bit of The Blair Witch Project (1999) with its shaky camera, dark, raw tones, and independent nature.

Recommended mostly for fans of horror.

Independent Spirit Award Nominations: Best Supporting Female-Ashley Bell, Best First Feature

Loving-2016

Loving-2016

Director Jeff Nichols

Starring Joel Edgerton, Ruth Negga

Scott’s Review #527

80099974

Reviewed November 26, 2016

Grade: A

Loving (2016) is a quiet film.

Subdued and poignant, it is an important historical story to tell and jarring to be transported back to the 1950s Southern style, where interracial marriage was not only illegal, but children of interracial couples were barely considered human beings.

This is to say nothing of the views of their parents, specifically of law enforcement.

Sadly, circa 2016, we all should be aware that racism is still alive and well in the United States, and this film is a reminder of how much further we need to go.

The true story of the landmark 1967 Loving vs. Virginia Supreme Court case is the basis for this film.

The time is 1958 in Virginia, and a sweet, working-class couple, Richard and Mildred, are very much in love. Richard-white and Mildred-black are met with some sideways glances around town but generally have a strong, supportive family and friend structure, although both families are pretty poor.

They enjoy spending time with friends in bars and racing cars.

When Mildred becomes pregnant, Richard purchases a plot of land for them and asks Mildred to marry him. Despite the challenges this will create, they are wed in Washington, D.C. Once they return to Virginia, they are arrested for violating anti-miscegenation laws prohibiting interracial marriage.

The couple eventually sued the state of Virginia, leading to a unanimous Supreme Court ruling a decade later.

As a film, Loving is thoughtful and introspective.

The audience questions who we are to decide who someone loves. This can apply to same-sex couples as easily as interracial couples.

The film, led by director Jeff Nichols, creates many quiet scenes of thoughtfulness on the faces of leads Edgerton and Negga.

Furthermore, several scenes of peril encompass the film.

The Lovings constantly threaten to be discovered as they secretly return to their forbidden home state to give birth to their son, only wanting Richard’s mother to perform the birth. The tense scene where Mildred is dropped off on a deserted back road is well shot; the camera constantly focuses on the road and the threat of a car coming by at any moment.

Edgerton, a fantastic actor and director, performs tremendously as a quiet, stoic, blue-collar man who is madly in love with his wife and sees nothing wrong with it simply because it is not the norm.

He is poorly educated, but Edgerton gives him underlying intelligence and a basic understanding of cherished love and more than once calmly utters, “But I love my wife.”

To him, it is that simple. Richard will also use any necessary measures to protect his family, as any man would. Edgerton’s squinting blue eyes portray suspicion, warmth, and love.

Negga is equally compelling as calm and loyal Mildred.

One might expect Mildred to finally explode with rage as she faces obstacle after obstacle, raising three kids in an environment she does not want, yet she never does.

Negga embodies the character with sweetness, wide-eyed passion, and longing for a better life. Mildred tries not to get her hopes up with each impending court date, but Negga successfully portrays the character with many different emotions and complexities.

My favorite scenes of hers involve Mildred gazing at her husband, her eyes filled with love and pride.

Nichols wisely does not spend much time in the courtroom, a positive aspect of the film. Sure, we get the occasional scene of Richard and Mildred facing the court, but the film does not take a different approach than necessary.

Despite a landmark decision coming from Loving’s marriage, the film is a love story between a good man and a good woman who happens to be of different races.

What a lesson every viewer can learn from Loving (2016).

Oscar Nominations: Best Actress-Ruth Negga

Independent Spirit Award Nominations: Best Director-Jeff Nichols, Best Female Lead-Ruth Negga

Despicable Me-2010

Despicable Me-2010

Directors: Pierre Coffin, Chris Renaud

Starring Steve Carell, Jason Segel

Scott’s Review #526

70115629

Reviewed November 25, 2016

Grade: B-

My immediate reaction upon seeing Despicable Me (2010) is that it’s a cute film, just custom-made for the masses- children and families alike.

This is fine, but I was honestly hoping for something a bit edgier or with more substance, though I still enjoyed it.

The film is a fun, family-style affair for all ages with a nice story.

It follows a villain named Gru, who competes with other super-villains and hatches a plan to shrink and steal the moon.

He is reformed through three orphans (Margo, Edith, and Agnes) he first uses in his plan, but later comes to love and eventually adopts.

The orphans predictably reform Gru and bring out the nice man within him.

They change his life for the better.

Nothing is wrong with this film, nor is there anything tremendous about it. I know some people loved it.

To me, Despicable Me (2010) was decent, but I wanted a bit more and perhaps a more complex or interesting plot; that is just my taste talking.

True Grit-2010

True Grit-2010

Directors Ethan Coen, Joel Coen

Starring Jeff Bridges, Hailee Steinfeld

Scott’s Review #525

70142543

Reviewed November 24, 2016

Grade: A-

Having not seen the original 1969 version of True Grit, starring John Wayne, I cannot compare the two, but the 2010 remake is excellent.

I do not profess to be the greatest fan of the western genre, as stereotypes are usually peppered throughout and the good-versus-bad clichés are done to death. Still, True Grit is a different, contemporary western.

Fantastic-looking with numerous big, current stars, humor, and quirkiness.

True Grit is a mainstream (in camera and style) Hollywood Western (the Coen Bros. are usually grittier in their stories), but it’s well made.

The odd supporting characters make this film fantastic, and it has an edge that enamored me.

The film also contains some Quentin Tarantino elements, making it left of center in some ways.

It follows a tomboy-like fourteen-year-old girl, Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), who narrates the film as she hires an aging U.S. Marshal (Jeff Bridges) to avenge her father’s death.

The story is well told, and the cinematography and attention to detail are great, giving off a crisp feel of really being in the Wild West.

Oscar Nominations: Best Picture, Best Director-Ethan Coen and Joel Coen, Best Actor-Jeff Bridges, Best Supporting Actress-Hailee Steinfeld, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, Best Art Direction, Best Cinematography, Best Costume Design

Embrace of the Serpent-2015

Embrace of the Serpent-2015

Director Ciro Guerra

Starring Nilbio Torres, Antonio Bolívar

Scott’s Review #524

80060032

Reviewed November 23, 2016

Grade: B+

Embrace of the Serpent (2015) is a cerebral experience of complex storytelling, weaving two parallel stories set forty years apart.

It is an immensely creative film, crafting a black-and-white cinematic expressionism into its lurid walls.

Admittedly, I found the stories tough to follow at times, and the film contains an impressionistic quality, but I knew I was watching something creative and brave.

That is worthy of a hefty thumbs up.

The setting is the Amazon jungle, along the vast Amazon River, deep in the heart of South America.

The story spans 1909 and 1940, and both feature an Amazonian shaman who is the last of his people and deeply resentful of white men.

In 1909, he traveled with a dying German scientist, and in 1940, with an American.

Both look for a sacred healing plant with magical powers.

Both parallel stories feature a Spanish Catholic mission along an Amazon tributary.

In 1909, the leading priest was sadistic and abusive towards the young boys in his charge. Years later, the young boys are now hardened and grizzled.

Both stories also reveal the plant, though in different ways and with vastly different outcomes.

The best part, and much better than the storyline, is the black-and-white visuals. This gives the film a mysterious, old-world vibe that makes it feel like a film made in the 1940s, if not earlier.

In this way, it becomes a visual spectacle, especially as countless scenes unfold along the Amazon, where the characters float by canoe and are treated to the beauty of the water and the surrounding lush mountains.

It feels otherworldly, a part of a remote continent few see or appreciate.

This is my favorite aspect of the film.

The stories are complex and sometimes don’t make complete sense, and I found myself a bit confused throughout, but this may be because of the film’s clear art-film persona, which leaves it open to interpretation.

Both white men have different experiences with the sought-after plant.

I was left with some questions even after reading the synopsis. One of the men has a dreamy, hallucinating experience with the magical plant, but what happens after?

The shaman is an interesting character, as we see him as a young man and later as an older man living a lonely, resentful life.

Embrace of the Serpent (2015) is a perplexing, interpretive film with a magical quality; if the story is muddy, you can whisk away to a fantastic experience just by watching and enjoying the cinematic treats it offers.

Oscar Nominations: Best Foreign Language Film

Independent Spirit Award Nominations: Best International Film