Fellini’s Roma-1972

Director Federico Fellini

Starring Peter Gonzales, Britta Barnes

Top 250 Films #122

Scott’s Review #649

Reviewed June 5, 2017

Grade: A-

Fellini’s Roma (1973) is a trippy experience set in Rome across two different periods.

As with all Fellini films, the film is meant to be experienced rather than analyzed.

One must nestle into the life that Fellini offers on-screen- in this instance, the fabulous city of Rome, Italy, in both positives and negatives.

The experience was very good for me, as both a world of odd characters and of ancient Rome oozed from the screen appealingly and absurdly.

From a plot narrative- there is a rot one. Arguably, the only character portrayed is Rome herself. The film takes place in both the 1930s and the 1970s and is said to be an autobiographical tale of director Fellini’s experiences growing up in Rome.

We see little Fellini as a youngster, experiencing the vast city for the first time, and as a teenager, now living in the city. Interestingly, the film moves back and forth between the two periods with no rhyme or reason.

Throughout the film, we see both the beauty and the ugliness of Rome- the majestic Colosseum and the dirty entrails of the gloomy city. Scenes of seedy brothels, mainly in the 1930s, and a myriad of strange and scantily clad females prance before the cameras, looking for a lucky score amid the droves of men lusting after them.

Another depicts a fashion show, of sorts, taking place at the Vatican, involving nuns and priests in bizarre costumes.

The 1930’s setting is my personal favorite. Gritty, cold, and harsh, Rome’s bleakness is depicted. Unsurprisingly, this has much to do with the historical period: since Mussolini was in power and on the eve of World War II, the darkness was apparent.

In a frightening scene, bomb sirens wail while a woman shrieks in panic. The brothel scenes are downright creepy, and the subsequent theatre scenes involving drunken, rowdy, young men leering and cursing at the entertainment are a particular slice of a life sequence.

In contrast, the 1970s sequences are layered with more beautiful depictions of the city. Brighter colors predominate, and there appear to be scientists or explorers digging into ancient ruins, finding gorgeous art that is subsequently damaged by the wind. We also see hippy types basking in the sunlight.

Again, much of this film is largely open to interpretation.

I adore Fellini’s Roma in terms of an expression of the city of Rome as an art form, but the film is highly unconventional- another plus for me.

Sure, I may have wanted to learn more about the bevy of creepy and potentially interesting characters. Still, I finished the film with an appreciation for Rome unlike any I have ever known.

A startling final scene, in which legendary Italian film star Anna Magnani appears scantily clad, implied to be a prostitute, was filmed shortly before her untimely death at the age of sixty-five.

As a film, Fellini’s Roma (1972) is a wonderful history lesson, but also a lesson in interpretation and film appreciation. Most filmgoers are accustomed to a beginning, middle, and end, as well as some semblance of a plot.

Roma contains none of that; rather, it is mind-opening and still fresh many years after its release, which is a true testament.