Tag Archives: Hugh Keays-Byrne

Mad Max-1979

Mad Max-1979

Director George Miller

Starring Mel Gibson, Joanne Samuel

Top 250 Films #237

Scott’s Review #1,070

Reviewed October 15, 2020

Grade: A-

Mad Max (1979) is a gritty, dirty film unlike any that came before it. There is an edginess and an “off the beaten track” quality that sucks you in and pummels you into submission with its energy and ferocity.

The film is raw and not slick, and hats off for that. This is all done with fun intentions, and it’s meant to be enjoyed, but the film has brutality and power that must be experienced to be believed.

The plot is not the most important quality, nor is it the most believable, but it’s the trimmings that make Mad Max unforgettable.

I haven’t seen the two follow-up sequels, Mad Max 2 (1981) or Beyond Thunderdome (1985), but my understanding is that they are more family-friendly films, which is disappointing to hear after experiencing the raw power of the original.

The undesirable Fury Road (2015) is an enormous critical and commercial success, but its appeal was lost on me; it’s best skipped in favor of the first.

I disliked that film.

But alas, a treasure such as the original can never be duplicated. The revenge-themed, fast car-driving, lewd masterpiece is a must-see cult classic.

It stands the test of time.

In a post-apocalyptic future, an angry cop, Max Rockatansky (Mel Gibson), is looking forward to retiring, having had enough of the derelicts who populate his region. One day, his world is shattered when a malicious gang murders his family as an act of retaliation, forcing a devastated Max to hit the open road seeking vengeance.

As he travels the Australian outback’s empty stretches of highway, he tours the bloodstained battlegrounds ruled by low-life bikers who feed on violence.

Mad Max made Mel Gibson a star. His breakthrough role led to future work in the action and buddy genres, specifically the Lethal Weapon franchise (1987-1998), with tepid success from any artistic standpoint until he bravely took on more creative and challenging roles.

Max is his finest action character and most authentic feeling. He mixes a blend of rage, sentimentality, and humanity perfectly, never missing a beat.

And his youthful looks are enchanting.

The multitude of scenes featuring super-fast cars, motorbike gangs, and leather-clad creatures with colorful tattoos and missing teeth is just the icing on the cake of the fun that lies ahead.

Names like Toecutter and Bubba give you an idea here.

These are all great add-ons, but the revenge-seeking Max is the one to watch. The scene is immediately set when Max kills the grizzled Nightrider in a chaotic police chase. His gang goes rampant and loots and destroys shops and businesses, raping both women and men. All hell breaks loose.

The best sequence is also the most horrific.

Taking place on the open road, naturally, a sweet vacation by Max, his wife Jessie (Joanne Samuel), and son Sprog begins with a pleasant drive, only to culminate in a chase that ends with Sprog’s death and Jessie languishing in intensive care.

The image of Sprog and Jessie lying on the open road, tattered and torn, is memorable and lingers.

The film is intelligent if studied thoroughly, and a film school study is recommended. Credit must be given to director George Miller, who knows his way around a camera.

The cinematography greatly contributes to the film, and a feeling of being there is the desired result. The editors deserve a special prize for their brilliant efforts.

Undoubtedly influencing countless action genre selections of the 1980s and 1990s, most running the gamut between only marginally fun (the Terminator franchise, 1984-present) or downright atrocious (The Running Man, 1987), Mad Max (1979) breathes life into the genre.

Action films are widely regarded as one-dimensional. Still, by adding a cool Australian locale, characters filled with cartoon bombast and punky zest, and a futuristic mystique, Miller crafts a well-made film.

Mad Max (1979) is a low-budget flick, destined for underground viewership and appreciation, that is somehow nearly flawless.

Mad Max: Fury Road-2015

Mad Max: Fury Road-2015

Director George Miller

Starring Tom Hardy, Charlize Theron

Scott’s Review #287

80025919

Reviewed November 20, 2015

Grade: C-

Having almost nothing to do with the original (and far superior) 1979 version of Mad Max, the 2015 Mad Max, sub-titled Fury Road (presumably for the endless car chases across the desert), looks great from a visual perspective.

The charisma of Tom Hardy and Charlize Theron is appealing, the story is non-existent and the film grows tedious after the initial admiration I first felt for the camera work and the dream-like vision the film possesses.

Initially, and admittedly, I was quite impressed with the film- a dreamlike, glossy look makes it a fantasy that one can escape into.

However, after some time, I began growing tired of the visuals, viewing it as a somewhat video game, instead of noticing the lack of story, which glared.

Sure, the thinly laid plot-line involved a rebel, Max Rockatansky (Tom Hardy), escaping the War Boys, where he has been kept as a blood donor against his will, joined by Furiosa (Charlize Theron) and a group of young, beautiful females escaping a life of breeding.

The group joins forces to allude, Immortan Joe, who chases them throughout the barren desert as they strive to reach safety in the beautiful “Green Place”, a land of prosperity that Furiosa remembers from childhood.

But this synopsis is similar to countless other action or adventure tales that have come and gone without distinction.

Again, compared to the original, I was expecting more from Mad Max: Fury Road and did not receive it.

The story fails because there is no rooting value. Since the film is a fantasy, per se, I did not find much investment in the characters getting to the “Green Place”.

The sweltering heat of the post-apocalyptic desert gives the film a roasting, tense look, and the action is almost non-stop.

Cartoon-like characters come and go, writhing on tops of cars or simply looking sinister with sneers and evil smirks, adding little to the story. Who are they? What is their purpose other than to look menacing?

I did admire the character of Furiosa. With a buzz-cut and a bad-ass swagger, the character is no-nonsense and in control throughout the film.

Certainly an inspirational female character, she adds zest to the film, which, on the surface, seems male-dominated. A female who can inspire and impress in this day and age is reasoning enough to mention.

Inexplicably, the reviews for Mad Max: Fury Road were positive and I do not get that. My overall perspective disagrees with these findings. I do not mean to imply that the film is “run of the mill” in an overall critique. It’s not.

There are fits and starts of creativity, as the glossy look of the film is admittedly a treat and a spectacle, but, alas, without a compelling story, this only goes so far before it begins to wear thin as an overall production.

Little chemistry or much dialogue between Hardy and Theron exists. Both are top-notch talents in their own right. Rather, grunts and facial expressions run rampant between the pair.

If the film was going for any sexual connection between the two, especially given the hot, steamy desert atmosphere, this intention fell flat as I noticed none.

To admire visually, the latest Mad Max (2015) may be worth a glimmer, but as a film that contains the entire package, this one is not worth its salt.

Oscar Nominations: 6 wins-Best Picture, Best Director-George Miller, Best Sound Editing (won), Best Sound Mixing (won), Best Production Design (won), Best Cinematography, Best Makeup and Hairstyling (won), Best Costume Design (won), Best Film Editing (won), Best Visual Effects